BACKGROUND: Communication breakdowns in cancer care are common and represent a failure in patient-centered care. While multiple studies have elicited patients' perspectives on these breakdowns, little is known about cancer care providers' attitudes regarding the causes and potential solutions. OBJECTIVE: To examine providers' (1) perceptions of the nature and causes of communication breakdowns with patients in cancer care and (2) suggestions for managing and preventing breakdowns. DESIGN: Qualitative study of nine focus groups held at three sites (Massachusetts, Georgia and Washington). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine providers: 33% primary care physicians, 14% oncologists, 36% nurses, and 17% nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and others. APPROACH: Directed content analysis of focus group transcripts. KEY RESULTS: Providers' perceptions of the causes of communication breakdowns fell into three categories: causes related to patients, providers, or healthcare systems. Providers perceived that patients sometimes struggle to understand cancer and health-related information, have unrealistic expectations, experience emotional and psychological distress that interferes with information exchange; and may be reticent to share their confusion or concerns. Providers described their own and colleagues' contributions to these breakdowns as sharing inaccurate, conflicting, or uncoordinated information. Providers also described the difficulty in balancing hope with reality in discussions of prognosis. System issues named by providers included insufficient time with patients, payment systems, and changing protocols that inhibit communication and coordination of care. Potential solutions included greater patient engagement, team coordination, and systems that promote patient feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Providers described multiple causes for communication breakdowns at the patient, provider, and system level. Multi-level interventions that coordinate care and encourage feedback may help to address or prevent communication breakdowns.
BACKGROUND: Communication breakdowns in cancer care are common and represent a failure in patient-centered care. While multiple studies have elicited patients' perspectives on these breakdowns, little is known about cancer care providers' attitudes regarding the causes and potential solutions. OBJECTIVE: To examine providers' (1) perceptions of the nature and causes of communication breakdowns with patients in cancer care and (2) suggestions for managing and preventing breakdowns. DESIGN: Qualitative study of nine focus groups held at three sites (Massachusetts, Georgia and Washington). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine providers: 33% primary care physicians, 14% oncologists, 36% nurses, and 17% nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and others. APPROACH: Directed content analysis of focus group transcripts. KEY RESULTS: Providers' perceptions of the causes of communication breakdowns fell into three categories: causes related to patients, providers, or healthcare systems. Providers perceived that patients sometimes struggle to understand cancer and health-related information, have unrealistic expectations, experience emotional and psychological distress that interferes with information exchange; and may be reticent to share their confusion or concerns. Providers described their own and colleagues' contributions to these breakdowns as sharing inaccurate, conflicting, or uncoordinated information. Providers also described the difficulty in balancing hope with reality in discussions of prognosis. System issues named by providers included insufficient time with patients, payment systems, and changing protocols that inhibit communication and coordination of care. Potential solutions included greater patient engagement, team coordination, and systems that promote patient feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Providers described multiple causes for communication breakdowns at the patient, provider, and system level. Multi-level interventions that coordinate care and encourage feedback may help to address or prevent communication breakdowns.
Authors: Benjamin W Lamb; Katrina F Brown; Kamal Nagpal; Charles Vincent; James S A Green; Nick Sevdalis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-03-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Edward H Wagner; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Sarah M Greene; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl J Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Steven B Clauser Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-12
Authors: Sally Thorne; Elizabeth-Anne Armstrong; Susan R Harris; T Gregory Hislop; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Valerie Oglov; John L Oliffe; Kelli I Stajduhar Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2009-10
Authors: Dominick L Frosch; Suepattra G May; Katharine A S Rendle; Caroline Tietbohl; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jessica Chubak; Rebecca Ziebell; Robert T Greenlee; Stacey Honda; Mark C Hornbrook; Mara Epstein; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Pamala A Pawloski; Debra P Ritzwoller; Nirupa R Ghai; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Heather A Clancy; V Paul Doria-Rose; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Neli Slavova-Azmanova; Jade C Newton; Harry Hohnen; Claire E Johnson; Christobel Saunders Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Minal Kale; Laura Robbins; David Pfister; Elizabeth Fortier; Valerie Pocus; Susan Chimonas; Saul N Weingart Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Paul E Nevin; Magaly Blas; Angela Bayer; Marina Angelica Chiappe Gutierrez; Deepa Rao; Yamilé Molina Journal: Health Care Women Int Date: 2019-05-15
Authors: Raquel C Greer; Yang Liu; Kerri Cavanaugh; Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis; Michelle M Estrella; C John Sperati; Sandeep Soman; Khaled Abdel-Kader; Varun Agrawal; Laura C Plantinga; Jane O Schell; James F Simon; Joseph A Vassalotti; Bernard G Jaar; Michael J Choi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.128