Literature DB >> 24599663

[Retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation technique for aphakia].

W Sekundo1, T Bertelmann, S Schulze.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overview of the retropupillary implantation of iris claw intraocular lenses (Artisan®,Ophtec, Groningen, Niederlande and Verisyse(TM),AMO, Santa Ana CA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search and review of implantation techniques, patient selection, potential complications and management strategies.
RESULTS: This approach has the advantage of a simple implantation technique, an anatomically correct implantation site (as compared to endocapsular implantation) and a relatively low complication rate. An intact iris is, however, a prerequisite for this technique. Ischemic vitreoretinopathies, such as diabetes or vascular occlusive entities, as well as uveitis might be considered as contraindications.
CONCLUSIONS: The retropupillary implantation of iris claw intraocular lenses is an interesting and especially time-effective rehabilitation technique for aphakia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599663     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2852-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  21 in total

1.  Position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses.

Authors:  K Schöpfer; A Berger; C Korb; B M Stoffelns; N Pfeiffer; W Sekundo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens for aphakia.

Authors:  Y Eve Hsing; Graham A Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Change in pupil size after implantation of an iris-fixated toric phakic intraocular lens.

Authors:  H Burkhard Dick; Shakhsanam Aliyeva; Mana Tehrani
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Behaviour of the phakic iris-claw intraocular lens (Artisan /Verisyse) during accommodation: an optical coherence biometry study.

Authors:  W Sekundo; W Bissmann; A Tietjen
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Aphakic retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) pseudophakic accommodation.

Authors:  Virgilio Galvis; Alejandro Tello; Néstor I Carreño; Mario L Revelo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  New forceps and spatula for easy retropupillary implantation of iris claw lenses in aphakia: experience in 4 years of use.

Authors:  W Sekundo
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Visual outcomes and complications following posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Gonnermann; Necip Torun; Matthias K J Klamann; Anna-Karina B Maier; Christoph V Sonnleithner; Antonia M Joussen; Peter W Rieck; Eckart Bertelmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  [Retropupillary fixation of the iris claw lens in aphakia. 1 year outcome of a new implantation techniques].

Authors:  A Mohr; F Hengerer; C Eckardt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Implantation of retropupillar iris claw lenses with and without combined penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Florian Rüfer; Mark Saeger; Bernhard Nölle; Johann Roider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Artisan aphakic lens for cataract surgery in anterior megalophthalmos.

Authors:  Virgilio Galvis; Alejandro Tello; Giuseppe Miotto; Carlos M Rangel
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Combination of different techniques for secondary anchoring of intraocular lenses].

Authors:  W Sekundo; T Bertelmann; S Schulze
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Retroiridal implantation of a Verisyse™ iris claw lens: refractive outcome and individualized intraocular lens constants].

Authors:  I Schmidt; A Langenbucher; S Moussa; F Schirra; B Seitz; T Eppig
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Clinical outcome and endothelial loss following prepupillary and retropupillary implantation of iris claw intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Ebubekir Durmus; Fehim Esen; Melda Yenerel; Huseyin Sanisoglu; Halit Oguz
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Authors' reply.

Authors:  Sezer Helvaci; Selahaddin Demirdüzen; Hüseyin Öksüz
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Optical Coherence Tomography Position Analysis of Retropupillary Iris-Fixated Intraocular Lens in Iris Tissue.

Authors:  Jana C Riedl; Michael R Bopp; Charlotte F Gross; Urs Vossmerbaeumer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation.

Authors:  Sezer Helvaci; Selahaddin Demirduzen; Huseyin Oksuz
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Yanxiu Sun; Maximilian Hammer; Timur M Yildirim; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.