| Literature DB >> 24599327 |
Chika K Onwuamah1, Sabdat O Ekama2, Rosemary A Audu1, Oliver C Ezechi2, Miriam C Poirier3, Peter G C Odeigah4.
Abstract
Antiretroviral drugs have proved useful in the clinical management of HIV-infected persons, though there are concerns about the effects of exposure to these DNA-reactive drugs. We investigated the potential of the plant model Allium cepa root tip assay to demonstrate the cytogenotoxicity of zidovudine and nevirapine and as a replace-reduce-refine programme amenable to resource-poor research settings. Cells mitotic index were determined in squashed root cells from Allium cepa bulbs exposed to zidovudine or nevirapine for 48 hr. The concentration of zidovudine and nevirapine inhibiting 50% root growth after 96 hr exposure was 65.0 µM and 92.5 µM respectively. Root length of all antiretroviral-exposed roots after 96 hr exposure was significantly shorter than the unexposed roots while additional root growth during a subsequent 48 hr recovery period in the absence of drug was not significantly different. By ANOVA, there was a significant association between percentage of cells in mitosis and zidovudine dose (p=0.004), but not nevirapine dose (p=0.68). Chromosomal aberrations such as sticky chromosomes, chromatin bridges, multipolar mitoses and binucleated cells were observed in root cells exposed to zidovudine and nevirapine for 48 hr. The most notable chromosomal aberration was drug-related increases in sticky chromosomes. Overall, the study showed inhibition in root length growth, changes in the mitotic index, and the induction of chromosomal aberrations in Allium bulbs treated for 96 hr or 48 hr with zidovudine and nevirapine. The study reveals generalized cytogenotoxic damage induced by exposure to zidovudine and nevirapine, and further show that the two compounds differ in their effects on mitosis and the types of chromosomal aberrations induced.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24599327 PMCID: PMC3943917 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Allium cepa root length grown for 96 hr in zidovudine (black line) or nevirapine (grey line).
Expressed as percentage of the unexposed control with value 34.6±2.7 mm (mean ± SE; n = 5 bulbs/group). The drug concentration giving half maximal root growth length (EC50) for zidovudine (ZDV) was 65.0 µM, and for nevirapine (NVP) was 92.5 µM. At the 400, 800 and 1200 µM doses, roots from the NVP-exposed groups were significantly longer than those from the ZDV-exposed groups.
Figure 2Root length during the 96(horizontal stripes) and 144 hr (vertical stripes) growth periods.
For 96(NC = negative control), ZDV or NVP. From 96 hr to 144 hr (vertical stripes), all bulbs were grown in water without drug. Root length (mm) shown is mean ± Standard error, with n = 5 bulbs per group.
Impact of ZDV and NVP on the mitotic index of Allium cepa root cellsa exposed for 48 hr.
| Chemical Exposure (μM) | EC50 (%) | Cells evaluated (n) | Percentage of cells in Mitosis |
| None | - | 1000 | 4.1±2.3 |
| 6.5 ZDV | 10 | 736 | 6.5±3.3 |
| 16.3 ZDV | 25 | 744 | 5.5±2.6 |
| 32.5 ZDV | 50 | 747 | 7.6±3.4 |
| 65.0 ZDV | 100 | 690 | 2.7±2.1 |
| 9.3 NVP | 10 | 503 | 5.3±5.4 |
| 23.1 NVP | 25 | 361 | 4.1±4.8 |
| 46.3 NVP | 50 | 429 | 2.9±5.2 |
| 92.5 NVP | 100 | 720 | 5.0±3.5 |
Each experimental group contained 10 bulbs and 2–3 root tips from each bulb were squashed together on one slide. On each slide 40–100 cells were examined. Values shown are means ± standard deviation of the mean.
EC50 is the concentration of drug that inhibits Allium root growth length by 50%; 10% of EC50 is 5% of total root growth length.
For the percentage of cells in mitosis: for unexposed vs.32.5 µM ZDV, p = 0.02; for ZDV 50% of EC50 vs. NVP 50% of EC50, p = 0.03. All other associations were statistically non-significant.
Percentage of Allium cells with various chromosomal aberrations after exposure for 48 hr to ZDV or NVP.
| Chemical Exposure (μM) | Cells evaluated (n) | Sticky chromosomes | Chromatin bridges | Vagrant formsc (%) | Binucleate (%) | Multipolar mitosise (%) | Chromosomal Fragmentsf (%) | Total Aberration (%) |
| None | 1000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6.5 ZDV | 736 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 6.3 | 4.2 | - | 6.3 | 56.3 |
| 16.3 ZDV | 744 | 23.3 | 7.0 | 16.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | - | 55.8 |
| 32.5 ZDV | 747 | 24.6 | 8.8 | 12.3 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 56.1 |
| 65.0 ZDV | 690 | 57.9 | - | - | 5.3 | - | - | 63.2 |
| 9.3 NVP | 503 | 36.0 | - | 20.0 | - | - | - | 56.0 |
| 23.1 NVP | 361 | 53.3 | - | 6.7 | - | - | - | 60.0 |
| 46.3 NVP | 429 | 61.9 | - | - | 4.8 | - | - | 66.7 |
| 92.5 NVP | 720 | 56.8 | - | 2.7 | 5.4 | - | - | 64.9 |
Sticky chromosomes refer to the tendency of chromosome arms or entire chromosomes to stick together.
Chromatin bridges occur in mitosis when the telomeres of sister chromatids fuse together and fail to completely segregate into their respective daughter cells. c Vagrant forms refer to chromosomal formations different from the normal formation during mitosis.
Binucleated cells have more than one nucleus. e Multipolar mitosis occurs when the chromosomal material is pulled to more than two poles, resulting in the formation of a corresponding number of nuclei. f Chromosomal fragments refer to fragments of a chromosome that may be lacking a centromere and so is often lost when the cell divide.
Figure 3Micrographs of chromosomal aberrations seen in the treatment groups.
A – Normal metaphase from the negative control group. *B – Vagrant metaphase form with misaligned chromosomes in cell from 32.5 µM ZDV. *C – C-Metaphase chromosomes seen only in cells exposed to 32.5 µM ZDV. D – Cell exposed to 65 µM ZDV showing sticky chromosomes. E – Normal anaphase (early) from the negative control group. F – Mitotic figure from cell exposed to 6.5 µM ZDV showing anaphase bridges (arrowed). G – Mitotic figure showing cell exposed to 6.5 µM ZDV; arrows indicate uneven breaks (black) and chromosomal fragment (patterned). H – Interphase cells exposed to 6.5 µM ZDV indicating interphase arrest. *Challenges with instruments delayed taking micrographs till some slides started drying.