AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intensive glycaemic control (INT) and higher plasma C-peptide levels in patients with poorly controlled diabetes would be associated with better eye outcomes. METHODS: The incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) was assessed by grading seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs at baseline and 5 years later in 858 of 1,791 participants in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT). RESULTS: After adjustment for all covariates, risk of progression (but not incidence) of DR increased by 30% for each 1% increase in baseline HbA1c (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.123, 1.503; p = 0.0004). Neither assignment to INT nor age was independently associated with DR in the entire cohort. However, INT showed a biphasic interaction with age. The incidence of DR was decreased in INT participants ≤55 years of age (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24, 1.0) but increased in those ≥70 years old (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.0, 8.24) (p = 0.0043). The incidence of DR was reduced by 67.2% with each 1 pmol/ml increment in baseline C-peptide (OR 0.328; 95% CI 0.155, 0.7; p = 0.0037). Baseline C-peptide was also an independent inverse risk factor for the progression of DR, with a reduction of 47% with each 1 pmol/ml increase in C-peptide (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.305, 0.921; p = 0.0244). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Poor glucose control at baseline was associated with an increased risk of progression of DR. INT was associated with a decreased incidence of DR in younger patients but with an increased risk of DR in older patients. Higher C-peptide at baseline was associated with reduced incidence and progression of DR.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intensive glycaemic control (INT) and higher plasma C-peptide levels in patients with poorly controlled diabetes would be associated with better eye outcomes. METHODS: The incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) was assessed by grading seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs at baseline and 5 years later in 858 of 1,791 participants in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT). RESULTS: After adjustment for all covariates, risk of progression (but not incidence) of DR increased by 30% for each 1% increase in baseline HbA1c (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.123, 1.503; p = 0.0004). Neither assignment to INT nor age was independently associated with DR in the entire cohort. However, INT showed a biphasic interaction with age. The incidence of DR was decreased in INT participants ≤55 years of age (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24, 1.0) but increased in those ≥70 years old (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.0, 8.24) (p = 0.0043). The incidence of DR was reduced by 67.2% with each 1 pmol/ml increment in baseline C-peptide (OR 0.328; 95% CI 0.155, 0.7; p = 0.0037). Baseline C-peptide was also an independent inverse risk factor for the progression of DR, with a reduction of 47% with each 1 pmol/ml increase in C-peptide (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.305, 0.921; p = 0.0244). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Poor glucose control at baseline was associated with an increased risk of progression of DR. INT was associated with a decreased incidence of DR in younger patients but with an increased risk of DR in older patients. Higher C-peptide at baseline was associated with reduced incidence and progression of DR.
Authors: William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Y Ohkubo; H Kishikawa; E Araki; T Miyata; S Isami; S Motoyoshi; Y Kojima; N Furuyoshi; M Shichiri Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Nicholas Emanuele; Thomas Moritz; Ronald Klein; Matthew D Davis; Kathleen Glander; Anuradha Khanna; Lizy Thottapurathu; Gideon Bahn; William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Marinella Ruospo; Valeria M Saglimbene; Suetonia C Palmer; Salvatore De Cosmo; Antonio Pacilli; Olga Lamacchia; Mauro Cignarelli; Paola Fioretto; Mariacristina Vecchio; Jonathan C Craig; Giovanni Fm Strippoli Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-08
Authors: Poojitha Rajasekar; Christina L O'Neill; Lydia Eeles; Alan W Stitt; Reinhold J Medina Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Tandi E Matsha; Carmen Pheiffer; Tinashe Mutize; Rajiv T Erasmus; Andre P Kengne Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Nasrin Azad; Lily Agrawal; Gideon Bahn; Nicholas V Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Rodney Hayward; Domenic Reda Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 17.152