Femke D Vennik1, Samantha A Adams2, Marjan J Faber3, Kim Putters2. 1. Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: vennik@bmg.eur.nl. 2. Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' experiences with online health communities in which both physicians and patients participate (i.e. patient-to-doctor or 'P2D' communities). METHODS: A qualitative content analysis was conducted, based on observations in five P2D communities ranging from 8 to 21 months, and semi-structured interviews (N=17) with patients. RESULTS: Patients consider information from physicians and peers as two distinct sources, value both sources differently and appreciate accessing both in the same web space. According to respondents, physicians can provide 'reliable' and evidence-based information, while patients add experience-based information. Patients use this information for multiple purposes, including being informed about scientific research and personal reflection. CONCLUSION: Patients find P2D communities beneficial because they help patients to collect information from both medical experts and experiential experts in one place. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients use P2D communities to perform medical, emotional and lifestyle activities. The presence of physicians in P2D communities may inadvertently suggest that the quality of information used for the activities, is controlled. When information is not officially being checked, this should be stated explicitly on the website and supplemented with a statement that information is only indicative and that patients should at all times contact their own physicians.
OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' experiences with online health communities in which both physicians and patients participate (i.e. patient-to-doctor or 'P2D' communities). METHODS: A qualitative content analysis was conducted, based on observations in five P2D communities ranging from 8 to 21 months, and semi-structured interviews (N=17) with patients. RESULTS:Patients consider information from physicians and peers as two distinct sources, value both sources differently and appreciate accessing both in the same web space. According to respondents, physicians can provide 'reliable' and evidence-based information, while patients add experience-based information. Patients use this information for multiple purposes, including being informed about scientific research and personal reflection. CONCLUSION:Patients find P2D communities beneficial because they help patients to collect information from both medical experts and experiential experts in one place. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients use P2D communities to perform medical, emotional and lifestyle activities. The presence of physicians in P2D communities may inadvertently suggest that the quality of information used for the activities, is controlled. When information is not officially being checked, this should be stated explicitly on the website and supplemented with a statement that information is only indicative and that patients should at all times contact their own physicians.
Authors: Dirkjan Kauw; Han Repping-Wuts; Alida Noordzij; Nike Stikkelbroeck; Ad Hermus; Marjan Faber Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Matthew P M Graham-Brown; Cristina Vasilica; Tom Oates; Ben Light; Christian Clausner; Apostolos Antonacoloulos; Lydia Y J Chen; Paula Ormandy; Jonathan Barratt Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2017-11-23
Authors: Frances Griffiths; Tim Dobermann; Jonathan A K Cave; Margaret Thorogood; Samantha Johnson; Kavé Salamatian; Francis X Gomez Olive; Jane Goudge Journal: Policy Internet Date: 2015-09-01
Authors: Martina Bientzle; Jan Griewatz; Joachim Kimmerle; Julia Küppers; Ulrike Cress; Maria Lammerding-Koeppel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 5.428