Literature DB >> 24597608

Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Fan Feng1, Xiao Hua Li, Hai Shi, Guo Sheng Wu, Hong Wei Zhang, Xiao Nan Liu, Qing Chuan Zhao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of fast-track surgery (FTS) combined with laparoscopy for treating patients with rectal cancer and compare the results with those of the conventional perioperative intervention group.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients with rectal cancer were prospectively randomly assigned to the FTS combined with laparoscopy group and the conventional perioperative intervention plus laparoscopy group from November 2011 to November 2012. All patients received radical anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Their baseline characteristics and the perioperative outcomes were recorded for analyses.
RESULTS: Compared with the conventional perioperative intervention group, the fast-track protocol combined with laparoscopy could shorten the time to the first flatus (53.44 ± 23.64 h vs 67.85 ± 20.12 h, P = 0.001) and first defecation (65.23 ± 22.24 h vs 86.98 ± 24.85 h, P = 0.000) after operation, accelerate the decrease of white blood cell count (P < 0.05), inhibit body temperature augmentation (P < 0.05) and reduce postoperative complication rate (16.9% vs 3.5%, P = 0.030). In addition, the length of postoperative stay was also shortened (5.05 ± 1.38 days vs 6.98 ± 2.26 days, P = 0.000). The medical cost of hospitalization was also reduced in the FTS group.
CONCLUSION: FTS in combination with laparoscopy may accelerate the clinical recovery of patients with rectal cancer after surgery.
© 2014 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; fast-track surgery; laparoscopy; outcome; rectal neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24597608     DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dig Dis        ISSN: 1751-2972            Impact factor:   2.325


  18 in total

1.  What is fast track multimodal management of colorectal cancer surgery in real life?

Authors:  Bertrand Trilling; Pierre-Yves Sage; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.

Authors:  A Vignali; U Elmore; A Cossu; M Lemma; B Calì; P de Nardi; R Rosati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Bin Bai; Gang Ji; Yezhou Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Is the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Effective and Safe in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xiaofei Ni; Dan Jia; Yan Chen; Lei Wang; Jian Suo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Impact of fast-track care program in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a cohort-comparative study.

Authors:  Hélène Meillat; Victor Serenon; Clément Brun; Cécile de Chaisemartin; Marion Faucher; Bernard Lelong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine S M Lau; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopy is not enough: full ERAS compliance is the key to improvement of short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Hélène Meillat; Clément Brun; Christophe Zemmour; Cécile de Chaisemartin; Olivier Turrini; Marion Faucher; Bernard Lelong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Zhao; Jing-Xu Sun; Peng Gao; Xiao-Wan Chen; Yong-Xi Song; Xuan-Zhang Huang; Hui-Mian Xu; Zhen-Ning Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.

Authors:  Daiane Oliveira Tayar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello; Tiago M Magalhães; Claudia M Simões; José Otávio C Auler
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.