Literature DB >> 24597529

Plant age and genotype affect the bacterial community composition in the tuber rhizosphere of field-grown sweet potato plants.

Joana M Marques1, Thais F da Silva, Renata E Vollu, Arie F Blank, Guo-Chun Ding, Lucy Seldin, Kornelia Smalla.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that sweet potato genotypes containing different starch yields in their tuberous roots can affect the bacterial communities present in the rhizosphere (soil adhering to tubers) was tested in this study. Tuberous roots of field-grown sweet potato of genotypes IPB-149 (commercial genotype), IPB-052, and IPB-137 were sampled three and six months after planting and analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and pyrosequencing analysis of 16S rRNA genes PCR-amplified from total community DNA. The statistical analysis of the DGGE fingerprints showed that both plant age and genotypes influenced the bacterial community structure in the tuber rhizosphere. Pyrosequencing analysis showed that the IPB-149 and IPB-052 (both with high starch content) displayed similar bacterial composition in the tuber rhizosphere, while IPB-137 with the lowest starch content was distinct. In comparison with bulk soil, higher 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (qPCR) and numerous genera with significantly increased abundance in the tuber rhizosphere of IPB-137 (Sphingobium, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Chryseobacterium) indicated a stronger rhizosphere effect. The genus Bacillus was strongly enriched in the tuber rhizosphere samples of all sweet potato genotypes studied, while other genera showed a plant genotype-dependent abundance. This is the first report on the molecular identification of bacteria being associated with the tuber rhizosphere of different sweet potato genotypes.
© 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ipomoea batatas L.; bacterial communities; denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; pyrosequencing; sweet potato; tuber rhizosphere

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24597529     DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  35 in total

1.  Diversity and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Fungal Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil of Cotton in the Arid Region of Northwest China.

Authors:  YingWu Shi; HongMei Yang; Ming Chu; XinXiang Niu; XiangDong Huo; Yan Gao; Jun Zeng; Qing Lin; Kai Lou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Towards sustainable agriculture: rhizosphere microbiome engineering.

Authors:  Saira Bano; Xiaogang Wu; Xiaojun Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 5.560

3.  Transcriptomic analysis of tuberous root in two sweet potato varieties reveals the important genes and regulatory pathways in tuberous root development.

Authors:  Zhaoqin Cai; Zhipeng Cai; Jingli Huang; Aiqin Wang; Aaron Ntambiyukuri; Bimei Chen; Ganghui Zheng; Huifeng Li; Yongmei Huang; Jie Zhan; Dong Xiao; Longfei He
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.547

4.  Genotype-Specific Recruitment of Rhizosphere Bacteria From Sandy Loam Soil for Growth Promotion of Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii.

Authors:  Zeyang Li; Yingying Zheng; Yansu Li; Xu Cheng; Sanwen Huang; Xueyong Yang; Yuxuan Qin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Phosphate fertilization affects rhizosphere microbiome of maize and sorghum genotypes.

Authors:  Mariana Lourenço Campolino; Ubiraci Gomes de Paula Lana; Eliane Aparecida Gomes; Antônio Marcos Coelho; Sylvia Morais de Sousa
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 6.  Rhizosphere Microbiome Cooperations: Strategies for Sustainable Crop Production.

Authors:  Olubukola O Babalola; Obianuju C Emmanuel; Bartholomew S Adeleke; Kehinde A Odelade; Blessing C Nwachukwu; Oluwatobi E Ayiti; Taofeek T Adegboyega; Nicholas O Igiehon
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Functional soil microbiome: belowground solutions to an aboveground problem.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Lakshmanan; Gopinath Selvaraj; Harsh P Bais
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Differential microbial assemblages associated with shikonin-producing Borage species in two distinct soil types.

Authors:  Aliya Fazal; Minkai Yang; Zhongling Wen; Farman Ali; Ran Ren; Chenyu Hao; Xingyu Chen; Jiangyan Fu; Xuan Wang; Wencai Jie; Tongming Yin; Guihua Lu; Jinliang Qi; Yonghua Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Potential impacts of soil microbiota manipulation on secondary metabolites production in cannabis.

Authors:  Bulbul Ahmed; Mohamed Hijri
Journal:  J Cannabis Res       Date:  2021-07-03

10.  Plant genotype, microbial recruitment and nutritional security.

Authors:  Jai S Patel; Akanksha Singh; Harikesh B Singh; Birinchi K Sarma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.