Literature DB >> 24597526

Factors associated with high rates of caesarean section in Brazil between 1991 and 2006.

Sarah Raifman1, Antonio J Cunha, Marcia C Castro.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess trends in caesarean sections in Brazil, identify associated factors and evaluate changes in these factors over time.
METHODS: Nationally representative data from the 1996 Demographic and Health Survey (n = 4918) and the 2006 Brazilian National Survey (n = 6125) were analysed using binomial logistic regression to assess variations in caesarean sections. Univariate logistic regression and multivariate analysis were used to select variables for predicting caesarean sections and assess potential factors associated with them.
RESULTS: Caesarean sections increased from 33% in 1991 to 40% in 2006 and were significantly more common among older, highly educated, wealthy women living in the South, who had received antenatal care and been delivered by private caregivers. Wealthy, educated women were significantly less likely to have a caesarean section in 2006 than in 1991. Women living in urban areas and in the South had higher odds of caesarean sections in 1991, but not in 2006.
CONCLUSION: Caesarean section rates in Brazil increased by seven percentage points from 1991 to 2006, but factors associated with high rates changed over time. The odds of caesarean sections decreased for wealthy, educated women over time. By 2006, region and urban versus rural residence were no longer significantly associated with caesarean sections. ©2014 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; Caesarean; Childbirth; Pregnancy; child healt and Maternal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24597526     DOI: 10.1111/apa.12620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of induction versus spontaneous onset of labour at 40 and 41 GW: findings from a prospective database, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Hemantha Senanayake; Ilaria Mariani; Emanuelle Pessa Valente; Monica Piccoli; Benedetta Armocida; Caterina Businelli; Mohamed Rishard; Benedetta Covi; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Born in Brazil: shining a light for change.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; José M Belizán
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 3.  Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Xhyljeta Luta; Kali Tal; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bruna Dias Alonso; Flora Maria Barbosa da Silva; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Debra Bick
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.106

6.  Incidence and Determinants of Caesarean Section in Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Mahnaz Zarshenas; Yun Zhao; Colin W Binns; Jane A Scott
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.