Literature DB >> 24597427

Problems with the consensus definition of the therapeutic misconception.

David S Wendler1.   

Abstract

In a previous article,' I attempted to assess the likely impact of the most prominent versions of the therapeutic misconception (TM) on research subjects' informed consent. I concluded that the TM is not nearly as significant a concern as is commonly thought, and that focusing on it is more likely to undermine than promote research subjects' informed consent. A recent commentary rejects these conclusions, as least as they pertain to the "consensus" definition of the TM.2 The authors of the commentary argue that work on the TM remains central to ensuring the appropriateness of research subjects' consent and, by implication, the ethical acceptability of clinical research. The present work evaluates the arguments offered in support of these claims. This analysis reveals that the authors offer few substantive responses to my arguments, and the responses they do offer fail to undermine my prior conclusions. Furthermore, consideration of an additional issue-the emergence of learning healthcare systems-suggests that the TM is likely to be even less significant in the future, hence, focusing on it may be even more problematic than I argued previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24597427      PMCID: PMC4155983     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  6 in total

1.  Taking the measure of the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Time to stop worrying about the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  David S Wendler
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2012

3.  An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Nancy E Kass; Steven N Goodman; Peter Pronovost; Sean Tunis; Tom L Beauchamp
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Why we should continue to worry about the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Larry R Churchill; Nancy M P King; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2013

5.  Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Milena Anatchkova; Karen Albert; Laura B Dunn; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Larry R Churchill; Arlene M Davis; Michele M Easter; Christine Grady; Steven Joffe; Nancy Kass; Nancy M P King; Charles W Lidz; Franklin G Miller; Daniel K Nelson; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Barbra Bluestone Rothschild; Pamela Sankar; Benjamin S Wilfond; Catherine R Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning.

Authors:  Farshid Sepehrband; Kirsten M Lynch; Ryan P Cabeen; Clio Gonzalez-Zacarias; Lu Zhao; Mike D'Arcy; Carl Kesselman; Megan M Herting; Ivo D Dinov; Arthur W Toga; Kristi A Clark
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Synthesis and techno-economic assessment of microbial-based processes for terpenes production.

Authors:  Wenzhao Wu; Christos T Maravelias
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.040

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.