Hedayat Salari1, Rahim Ostovar2, Atefeh Esfandiari1, Ali Keshtkaran3, Ali Akbari Sari4, Hossein Yousefi Manesh5, Amir Rakhshan6. 1. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Research Center for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman , Iran. 2. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran. 3. Department of Medical Informatics and Management, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 4. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Shiraz Medical Students Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 6. Department of Foreign Languages, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MRI is a new and expensive diagnostic technology, which has been used increasingly all over the world. Low back pain is a worldwide prevalent disorder and MRI technique is one of the several ways to diagnose it. This paper aims to identify the appropriateness of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions in Shiraz teaching hospitals using standardized RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM) criteria in 2012. METHODS: This study consisted of two phases. The first phase involved a qualitative enquiry and the second phase had a quantitative cross-sectional nature. In the first phase RAM was used for developing lumbar spine MRI indications and scenarios. In the second phase, the finalized scenarios were compared with the history and physical examination of 300 patients with low back pain. The rate of appropriateness of lumbar spine MRI prescription was then calculated. RESULTS: Of 300 cases of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, approximately 167 (56%) were considered inappropriate, 72 (24%) were uncertain, and 61 (20%) were deemed to be appropriate. The economic burden of inappropriate prescriptions was calculated at 88,009,000 Rials. In addition, the types of expertise and physical examination were considered as related factors to appropriateness of prescriptions. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a large proportion of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, which result in financial burden on the insurance companies and the patients alike is unnecessary. This study suggests that policy makers consider this evidence while decision-making. Our findings highlight the imperative role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). As a result, developing local clinical guidelines may create the commitment needed in physicians in prescribing appropriate prescriptions within the health sector. The study further recommends that appropriate scenarios should be considered as a criterion for payment and reimbursement.
BACKGROUND: MRI is a new and expensive diagnostic technology, which has been used increasingly all over the world. Low back pain is a worldwide prevalent disorder and MRI technique is one of the several ways to diagnose it. This paper aims to identify the appropriateness of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions in Shiraz teaching hospitals using standardized RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM) criteria in 2012. METHODS: This study consisted of two phases. The first phase involved a qualitative enquiry and the second phase had a quantitative cross-sectional nature. In the first phase RAM was used for developing lumbar spine MRI indications and scenarios. In the second phase, the finalized scenarios were compared with the history and physical examination of 300 patients with low back pain. The rate of appropriateness of lumbar spine MRI prescription was then calculated. RESULTS: Of 300 cases of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, approximately 167 (56%) were considered inappropriate, 72 (24%) were uncertain, and 61 (20%) were deemed to be appropriate. The economic burden of inappropriate prescriptions was calculated at 88,009,000 Rials. In addition, the types of expertise and physical examination were considered as related factors to appropriateness of prescriptions. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a large proportion of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, which result in financial burden on the insurance companies and the patients alike is unnecessary. This study suggests that policy makers consider this evidence while decision-making. Our findings highlight the imperative role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). As a result, developing local clinical guidelines may create the commitment needed in physicians in prescribing appropriate prescriptions within the health sector. The study further recommends that appropriate scenarios should be considered as a criterion for payment and reimbursement.
Authors: Mohammad Palesh; Sten Fredrikson; Hamidreza Jamshidi; Pia Maria Jonsson; Goran Tomson Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Derek J Emery; Kaveh G Shojania; Alan J Forster; Naghmeh Mojaverian; Thomas E Feasby Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Mohammad Palesh; Carol Tishelman; Sten Fredrikson; Hamidreza Jamshidi; Göran Tomson; Azita Emami Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2010-04-06
Authors: Fiona J Gilbert; Adrian M Grant; Maureen G C Gillan; Luke D Vale; Marion K Campbell; Neil W Scott; David J Knight; Douglas Wardlaw Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-03-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hossein Ebrahimipour; Seyedeh Zahra Mirfeizi; Ali Vafaee Najar; Amir Reza Kachooei; Amir Shahriar Ariamanesh; Reza Ganji; Habibollah Esmaeeli; Hedayat Salari; Marjan Vejdani Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2014-03-15
Authors: John Stowe; Ali Hasayan Alanazi; Andrea Cradock; Rachel Toomey; Marie Galligan; John Ryan; Louise Rainford Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2022-07-28