Sampath Anche1, Pranitha Kakarla2, Krishna Kishore Kadiyala2, B Sreedevi2, Sandeep Chiramana3, Ravi Rakesh Dev J4, Sanjay Dutt Manne1, Deepthi G5. 1. Senior Lecturer, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences , Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India . 2. Professor, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences , Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India . 3. Private Practitioner, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India . 4. Reader, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences , Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India . 5. PG Student, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences , Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India .
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength between fiber reinforced composite post with three different composite core materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used for the study were: 30 maxillary central incisors, pre fabricated fiber reinforced composite post (postec plus posts), Multi-core heavy body, Ti-core, Fluoro-core, Etchant gel, Silane coupling agent, Dentin bonding agent, Standardized gutta percha points, Rely-X dual cure composite resin. A total of 30 human maxillary central incisor were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups of 10 specimens each namely A, B and C. RESULTS: The results obtained were analyzed by using one way analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference and they showed highest mean shear bond strength for group C when compared with group A and group B. There is no significant difference in the shear bond strength values between group A and group B. CONCLUSION: The teeth restored with multicore HB showed highest shear bond strength. The teeth restored with Fluoro core showed lowest shear bond strength. No statistically significant difference exists between the shear bond strength values between Ti-core and Fluoro-core.
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength between fiber reinforced composite post with three different composite core materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials used for the study were: 30 maxillary central incisors, pre fabricated fiber reinforced composite post (postec plus posts), Multi-core heavy body, Ti-core, Fluoro-core, Etchant gel, Silane coupling agent, Dentin bonding agent, Standardized gutta percha points, Rely-X dual cure composite resin. A total of 30 human maxillary central incisor were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups of 10 specimens each namely A, B and C. RESULTS: The results obtained were analyzed by using one way analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference and they showed highest mean shear bond strength for group C when compared with group A and group B. There is no significant difference in the shear bond strength values between group A and group B. CONCLUSION: The teeth restored with multicore HB showed highest shear bond strength. The teeth restored with Fluoro core showed lowest shear bond strength. No statistically significant difference exists between the shear bond strength values between Ti-core and Fluoro-core.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) post; Fluorocore; Multicore heavy body; Shear bond strength; Ti-core