Literature DB >> 2459677

Pacemaker syndrome with AAI rate variable pacing: importance of atrioventricular conduction properties, medication, and pacemaker programmability.

K den Dulk1, F W Lindemans, P Brugada, J L Smeets, H J Wellens.   

Abstract

A patient who received an AAI Activitrax rate variable pacemaker for treatment of symptomatic sinus bradycardia is described. disopyramide prolonged the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast conducting atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway to such an extent, that conduction switched to the slow AV nodal pathway at low atrial pacing rates. This gave rise to symptoms of the pacemaker syndrome during moderate exercise because the paced atrial event was conducted with a long, spike to Q interval with occurrence of the paced atrial event just after the preceding QRS complex. A change of medication solved this problem. Programming a bipolar electrode configuration avoided sensing of far-field QRS signals with the associated problems of resetting the basic pacing interval as well as the upper rate interval. AAI rate variable pacing requires careful evaluation of AV conduction properties, AV conduction intervals as well as the influence of medication to be given. The use of multiprogrammable pacemakers with marker channel capability will significantly facilitate the understanding and resolution of anomalous behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2459677     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb03976.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker syndrome: an iatrogenic condition.

Authors:  C M Travill; R Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-08

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  B Schwaab; D Schätzer-Klotz; M Berg; G Fröhlig; H Franow; H Schwerdt; H Schieffer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1998-02

3.  First-degree atrioventricular block. Clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management & consequences during cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Arzu Ilercil; Fabio Leonelli; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.

Authors:  G A Haywood; D Katritsis; J Ward; M Leigh-Jones; D E Ward; A J Camm
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-02

5.  Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.

Authors:  Philippe Mabo; Jean-Pierre Cebron; Aude Solnon; Aude Tassin; Laurence Graindorge; Daniel Gras
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

7.  Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace.

Authors:  Paul A Levine
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.