| Literature DB >> 24596621 |
P Subash-Babu1, Ali A Alshatwi1, S Ignacimuthu2.
Abstract
The present study was aimed to evaluate the antioxidant defense system of cinnamaldehyde in normal, diabetic rats and its possible protection of pancreatic β-cells against its gradual loss under diabetic conditions. In vitro free radical scavenging effect of cinnamaldehyde was determined using DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-dipicrylhydrazyl), superoxide radical, and nitric oxide radical. Streptozotocin (STZ) diabetic rats were orally administered with cinnamaldehyde at concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg body weight for 45 days. At the end of the experiment, the levels of plasma lipid peroxides and antioxidants such as vitamin C, vitamin E, ceruloplasmin, catalase, superoxide dismutase, reduced glutathione and glutathione peroxidase were determined. A significant increase in the levels of plasma glucose, vitamin E, ceruloplasmin, and lipid peroxides and significant decrease in the levels of plasma insulin and reduced glutathione were observed in the diabetic rats. Also the activities of pancreatic antioxidant enzymes were altered in the STZ-induced diabetic rats. The altered enzyme activities were reverted to near-normal levels after treatment with cinnamaldehyde and glibenclamide. Histopathological studies also revealed a protective effect of cinnamaldehyde on pancreatic β-cells. Cinnamaldehyde enhances the antioxidant defense against reactive oxygen species produced under hyperglycemic conditions and thus protects pancreatic β-cells against their loss and exhibits antidiabetic properties.Entities:
Keywords: Cinnamaldehyde; Cinnamonum zeylanicum; Diabetes; Streptozotocin; β-Islets
Year: 2014 PMID: 24596621 PMCID: PMC3936432 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2013.100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Comparison of abilities to scavenge DPPH (A), superoxide (B) and nitric oxide (C) radicals in vitro between cinnamaldehyde and ascorbic acid.
Fig. 2.Effect of cinnamaldehyde on plasma glucose levels (mg/dl) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic male Wistar rats. Group 1: Normal; Group 2: Normal+Cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/Kg bw); Group 3: Diabetic control; Group 4: Diabetic+Cinnamaldehyde (5 mg/kg bw); Group 5: Diabetic+Cinnamaldehyde (10 mg/kg bw); Group 6: Diabetic+Cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw); Group 7: Diabetic+Glibenclamide (0.6 mg/kg bw). Each value is mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p<0.05 (DMRT).
Fig. 3.Effect of cinnamaldehyde on plasma insulin levels (μU/ml) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic male Wistar rats. Group1: Normal; Group 2: Normal+Cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/Kg bw); Group 3: Diabetic control; Group 4: Diabetic+Cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw); Group 5: Diabetic+Glibenclamide (0.6 mg/kg bw). Each value is mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p<0.05 (DMRT).
Effect of cinnamaldehyde on plasma levels of TBARS, hydroperoxides, and non-ezymatic antioxidants in male Wistar rats with and without diabetes
| Groups | Normal | Normal + cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw) | Diabetic control | Diabetic + cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw) | Diabetic + glibenclamide (0.6 mg/kg bw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS (nMoles/ml) | 2.02 ± 0.12a | 2.18 ± 0.05a,b | 4.98 ± 0.15d | 2.24 ± 0.08b | 2.65 ± 0.09c |
| Hydroperoxides (valuex10−5 mMoles/dl) | 7.23 ± 0.28a | 7.84 ± 0.61a,b | 14.97 ± 0.74d | 8.10 ± 0.25b | 9.18 ± 0.29c |
| GSH (mg/dl) | 28.81 ± 1.19a | 30.10 ± 1.27a,b | 17.92 ± 0.77c | 26.37 ± 0.82a | 24.16 ± 0.57b |
| Vitamin C (mg/dl) | 1.71 ± 0.14a | 1.83 ± 0.10a | 0.85 ± 0.04c | 1.67 ± 0.03a | 1.59 ± 0.08a,b |
| Vitamin E (mg/dl) | 1.82 ± 0.25a | 1.78 ± 0.42a | 3.42 ± 0.37b | 1.68 ± 0.40a | 1.70 ± 0.39a |
| Ceruloplasmin (mg/dl) | 18.23 ± 1.75a | 22.94 ± 1.19a,b | 32.18± 2.01c | 20.63 ± 1.41a,b | 22.11 ± 1.26b |
Each value is mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group.
Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p<0.05 (DMRT).
Effect of cinnamaldehyde on pancreatic levels of TBARS, hydroperoxides, GSH, and enzymatic antioxidants in male Wistar rats with and without diabetes
| Groups | Normal | Normal + cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw) | Diabetic control | Diabetic + cinnamaldehyde (20 mg/kg bw) | Diabetic + glibenclamide (0.6 mg/kg bw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS | 32.40 ± 2.20a | 31.75 ± 2.30a | 67.28 ± 3.90c | 38.91 ± 3.10b | 36.27 ± 2.90a,b |
| Hydroperoxides | 12.65 ± 0.56a | 12.66 ± 1.18a | 22.16 ± 0.87b | 12.24 ± 0.51a | 13.03 ± 0.35a |
| GSH | 19.34 ± 0.62b | 20.46 ± 1.14b,c | 11.67 ± 1.18a | 21.43 ± 0.80c | 20.94 ± 0.61c |
| GPx | 28.31 ± 1.08c | 25.081.65b | 17.13 ± 0.56a | 26.44 ± 1.54b,c | 25.95 ± 1.44b,c |
| SOD | 4.05 ± 0.17b | 4.930.22c | 2.53 ± 0.34a | 3.96 ± 0.23b | 3.67 ± 0.22b |
| CAT | 17.90 ± 0.54e | 16.090.47d | 7.81 ± 0.29a | 15.17 ± 0.58c | 14.40 ± 0.42b |
Units: TBARS- nmols/100 g tissue; HP- nmols/100 g tissue; GSH- m moles/ g wet tissue; GPX - μg GSH consumed/ min/ mg protein; SOD-Enzyme concentration required to inhibit the O.D at 560nm of chromogen production by 50% in one min / mg protein; CAT- μmoles of H2O2 consumed/ min/ protein.
Each value is mean ± SD for 6 rats in each group.
Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p<0.05 (DMRT).
Fig. 4.Histopathological studies of normal and experimental diabetic rat pancreas (A–E). (A) Normal rat pancreas. Pancreas showing β-islets. (B) Normal+Cinnamaldehyde treated rat pancreas. Normal acini with islet cells. (C) Diabetic rat pancreas. Pancreatic acini with destroyed islet cells. (D) Diabetic+Cinnamaldehyde treated rats pancreas. Regenerating islet cells. (E) Diabetic+glibenclamide treated rat pancreas. Normal islets cells with mild fatty change.