Literature DB >> 24595733

Limited clinical benefit for surveillance PET-CT scanning in patients with histologically transformed lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy.

Chan Y Cheah1, Michael Dickinson, Michael S Hofman, Anupkumar George, David S Ritchie, H Miles Prince, David Westerman, Simon J Harrison, Kate Burbury, Max Wolf, Henry Januszewicz, Kirsten E Herbert, Dennis A Carney, Constantine Tam, John F Seymour.   

Abstract

The optimum follow-up of patients with transformed indolent lymphoma (TrIL) is not well defined. We sought to determine the utility of surveillance positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in patients with TrIL achieving complete metabolic remission (CMR) after primary therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with TrIL treated at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre between 2002 and 2012 who achieved CMR after primary therapy who had ≥1 subsequent surveillance PET-CT. Of 55 patients with TrIL, 37 (67 %) received autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation following chemoimmunotherapy. After a median follow-up of 34 (range 3-101) months, the actuarial 3-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77 % (95 %CI 62-86 %) and 88 % (75-94 %), respectively. Of 180 surveillance PET-CT scans, there were 153 true negatives, 4 false positives, 1 false negative, 7 indeterminate and 15 true positives. Considering indeterminate scans as false positives, the specificity of PET-CT for detecting relapse was 94 %, sensitivity was 83 %, positive predictive value was 63 % and negative predictive value was 98 %. All seven subclinical (PET detected) relapses were of low-grade histology; in contrast, all nine relapses with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were symptomatic. In our cohort of patients with TrIL achieving CMR, PET-CT detected subclinical low-grade relapses but all DLBCL relapses were accompanied by clinical symptoms. Thus, surveillance imaging of patients with TrIL achieving CMR is of limited clinical benefit. PET-CT should be reserved for evaluation of clinically suspected relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595733     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-014-2040-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  4 in total

1.  Baseline and ongoing PET-derived factors predict detrimental effect or potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) performed for surveillance in asymptomatic lymphoma patients in first remission.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Selene Capitanio; Fabrizio De Carli; Francesca Bongioanni; Enrico De Astis; Maurizio Miglino; Maria Teresa Verardi; Ambra Buschiazzo; Francesco Fiz; Cecilia Marini; Elena Pomposelli; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Charles Marcus; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Esther Mena; Shwetha Prasad; Abhinav K Jha; Lilja Solnes; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Lymphoma: Methods and Applications.

Authors:  Alex F Herrera; Philippe Armand
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Systematic review on the value of end-of-treatment FDG-PET in improving overall survival of lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.673

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.