PURPOSE: The A1AR antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine ([(18)F]CPFPX) has recently been shown to be a suitable radiotracer for quantitative in vivo imaging of the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) in rats. The present study evaluates the reproducibility of non-invasive longitudinal A1AR studies with [(18)F]CPFPX and a dedicated small animal positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. PROCEDURES: Twelve male Sprague Dawley rats underwent four repeated dynamic PET scans with a bolus injection of [(18)F]CPFPX. A1AR availability was determined by different non-invasive approaches including simplified and multilinear reference tissue (olfactory bulb)-based models and graphical methods. The outcome parameter binding potential (BP) was evaluated in terms of variability and reproducibility. RESULTS: Repeated estimations of [(18)F]CPFPX BP ND gave reliable results with acceptable variability (mean 12 %) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients raging from 0.57 to 0.68) in cortical and subcortical regions of the rat brain. With regard to kinetic models, test-retest stability of the simplified reference-tissue model (SRTM) was superior to multilinear and graphical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive quantification of A1AR density in the rat brain is reproducible and reliable with [(18)F]CPFPX PET and allows longitudinal designs of in vivo imaging studies in rodents.
PURPOSE: The A1AR antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine ([(18)F]CPFPX) has recently been shown to be a suitable radiotracer for quantitative in vivo imaging of the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) in rats. The present study evaluates the reproducibility of non-invasive longitudinal A1AR studies with [(18)F]CPFPX and a dedicated small animal positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. PROCEDURES: Twelve male Sprague Dawley rats underwent four repeated dynamic PET scans with a bolus injection of [(18)F]CPFPX. A1AR availability was determined by different non-invasive approaches including simplified and multilinear reference tissue (olfactory bulb)-based models and graphical methods. The outcome parameter binding potential (BP) was evaluated in terms of variability and reproducibility. RESULTS: Repeated estimations of [(18)F]CPFPX BP ND gave reliable results with acceptable variability (mean 12 %) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients raging from 0.57 to 0.68) in cortical and subcortical regions of the rat brain. With regard to kinetic models, test-retest stability of the simplified reference-tissue model (SRTM) was superior to multilinear and graphical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive quantification of A1AR density in the rat brain is reproducible and reliable with [(18)F]CPFPX PET and allows longitudinal designs of in vivo imaging studies in rodents.
Authors: Marcelo S Costa; Ana Paula Ardais; Gabriela T Fioreze; Sabrina Mioranzza; Paulo Henrique S Botton; Luis Valmor Portela; Diogo O Souza; Lisiane O Porciúncula Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Marcus H Holschbach; Ray A Olsson; Dirk Bier; Walter Wutz; Wiebke Sihver; Manfred Schüller; Bettina Palm; Heinz H Coenen Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Cindy Casteels; Peter Vermaelen; Johan Nuyts; Annemie Van Der Linden; Veerle Baekelandt; Luc Mortelmans; Guy Bormans; Koen Van Laere Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Ana Joya; María Ardaya; Alejandro Montilla; Maider Garbizu; Sandra Plaza-García; Vanessa Gómez-Vallejo; Daniel Padro; Juan José Gutiérrez; Xabier Rios; Pedro Ramos-Cabrer; Unai Cossío; Krishna R Pulagam; Makoto Higuchi; María Domercq; Fabio Cavaliere; Carlos Matute; Jordi Llop; Abraham Martín Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Jürgen W A Sijbesma; Xiaoyun Zhou; David Vállez García; Martin C Houwertjes; Janine Doorduin; Chantal Kwizera; Bram Maas; Peter Meerlo; Rudi A Dierckx; Riemer H J A Slart; Philip H Elsinga; Aren van Waarde Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.488