Natalie E Zlebnik1, Amy T Saykao, Marilyn E Carroll. 1. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA, zleb0002@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individually, both treatment with progesterone and concurrent access to an exercise wheel reduce cocaine self-administration under long-access conditions and suppress cocaine-primed reinstatement in female rats. In the present study, wheel running and progesterone (alone and combined) were assessed for their effects on reinstatement of cocaine-seeking primed by yohimbine, cocaine, and cocaine-paired cues. METHODS: Male and female rats were implanted with an intravenous catheter and allowed to self-administer cocaine (0.4 mg/kg/inf, iv) during 6-h sessions for 10 days. Subsequently, the groups of male and female rats were each divided into two groups that were given concurrent access to either a locked or unlocked running wheel under extinction conditions for 14 days. Next, all four groups were tested in a within-subjects design for reinstatement of cocaine-seeking precipitated by separate administration of cocaine-paired stimuli, yohimbine, or cocaine or the combination of yohimbine + cocaine-paired stimuli or cocaine + cocaine-paired stimuli. These priming conditions were tested in the presence of concurrent wheel access (W), pretreatment with progesterone (P), or both (W + P). RESULTS: In agreement with previous results, females responded more for cocaine than males during maintenance. Additionally, concurrent wheel running attenuated extinction responses and cocaine-primed reinstatement in females but not in males. Across all priming conditions, W + P reduced reinstatement compared to control conditions, and for cocaine-primed reinstatement in male rats, the combined W + P treatment was more effective than W or P alone. CONCLUSION: Under certain conditions, combined behavioral (exercise) and pharmacological (progesterone) interventions were more successful at reducing cocaine-seeking behavior than either intervention alone.
BACKGROUND: Individually, both treatment with progesterone and concurrent access to an exercise wheel reduce cocaine self-administration under long-access conditions and suppress cocaine-primed reinstatement in female rats. In the present study, wheel running and progesterone (alone and combined) were assessed for their effects on reinstatement of cocaine-seeking primed by yohimbine, cocaine, and cocaine-paired cues. METHODS: Male and female ratswere implanted with an intravenous catheter and allowed to self-administer cocaine (0.4 mg/kg/inf, iv) during 6-h sessions for 10 days. Subsequently, the groups of male and female ratswere each divided into two groups that were given concurrent access to either a locked or unlocked running wheel under extinction conditions for 14 days. Next, all four groups were tested in a within-subjects design for reinstatement of cocaine-seeking precipitated by separate administration of cocaine-paired stimuli, yohimbine, or cocaine or the combination of yohimbine + cocaine-paired stimuli or cocaine + cocaine-paired stimuli. These priming conditions were tested in the presence of concurrent wheel access (W), pretreatment with progesterone (P), or both (W + P). RESULTS: In agreement with previous results, females responded more for cocaine than males during maintenance. Additionally, concurrent wheel running attenuated extinction responses and cocaine-primed reinstatement in females but not in males. Across all priming conditions, W + P reduced reinstatement compared to control conditions, and for cocaine-primed reinstatement in male rats, the combined W + P treatment was more effective than W or P alone. CONCLUSION: Under certain conditions, combined behavioral (exercise) and pharmacological (progesterone) interventions were more successful at reducing cocaine-seeking behavior than either intervention alone.
Authors: Sarah K Sasse; Benjamin N Greenwood; Cher V Masini; Tara J Nyhuis; Monika Fleshner; Heidi E W Day; Serge Campeau Journal: Stress Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.493
Authors: John R Smethells; Natashia L Swalve; Lynn E Eberly; Marilyn E Carroll Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kathleen M Kantak; Jamie M Gauthier; Elon Mathieson; Eudokia Knyazhanskaya; Pedro Rodriguez-Echemendia; Heng-Ye Man Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2020-08-02 Impact factor: 3.332