Literature DB >> 24595400

Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patella: a multicenter experience.

Andreas H Gomoll1, Scott D Gillogly, Brian J Cole, Jack Farr, Ryan Arnold, Kristen Hussey, Tom Minas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cartilage defects in the patella are common, and a subset of patients does not respond to nonoperative measures. While most cartilage repair techniques have demonstrated good outcomes in the femoral condyles, the patellofemoral compartment poses special challenges. HYPOTHESIS: Repair of patellar cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) will provide lasting improvements in pain and function. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Patients were treated at 1 of 4 participating cartilage repair centers with ACI for cartilage defects in the patella; bipolar (patella + trochlea) defects were included as well. All patients were followed prospectively for at least 4 years with multiple patient-reported outcome instruments, including the International Knee Documentation Committee, Short Form-12, modified Cincinnati Rating Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Society scores. Treatment failure was defined as structural failure of the graft combined with pain requiring revision surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were available for analysis. As a group, they experienced both statistically significant and clinically important improvements in pain and function in all physical outcome scales. The International Knee Documentation Committee improved from 40 ± 14 preoperatively to 69 ± 20 at the last follow-up; the Cincinnati Rating Scale, from 3.2 ± 1.2 to 6.2 ± 1.8; and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, from 50 ± 22 to 29 ± 22 (all P < .0001). Ninety-two percent of patients stated that they would choose to undergo ACI again, and 86% rated their knees as good or excellent at the time of final follow-up. Nine patients (8%) were considered treatment failures, and 16% reported that their knees were not improved.
CONCLUSION: Cartilage repair in the patellofemoral joint is arguably not without its challenges. Autologous chondrocyte implantation remains off-label in the patella, a fact that needs to be discussed with prospective patients during the informed consent process. However, when performed with attention to patellofemoral biomechanics, self-rated subjective good and excellent outcomes can be achieved in more than 80% of patients treated with ACI, even in a patient population with large and frequently bipolar defects such as the one presented in this study. However, final functional scores, although significantly improved, still reflected residual disability in this challenging group of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous chondrocyte implantation; cartilage repair; multicenter study; patellofemoral

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595400     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514523927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  41 in total

1.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation to Isolated Patella Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Arvind von Keudell; Roger Han; Tim Bryant; Tom Minas
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Long-Term Clinical and MRI Results of Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee.

Authors:  Peter Cornelius Kreuz; Richard Horst Kalkreuth; Philipp Niemeyer; Markus Uhl; Christoph Erggelet
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Dry Arthroscopic Single-Stage Cartilage Repair of the Knee Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold With Activated Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Graeme P Whyte; Alberto Gobbi; Boguslaw Sadlik
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-08-22

4.  Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee.

Authors:  Thomas R Niethammer; Thomas Niethammer; Siegfried Valentin; Andreas Ficklscherer; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Mehmet Gülecyüz; Matthias F Pietschmann; Matthias Pietschmann; Peter E Müller; Peter Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation after failed bone marrow stimulation leads to inferior clinical results.

Authors:  Peter Ernst Müller; David Gallik; Florian Hammerschmid; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Matthias Frank Pietschmann; Anja Zhang; Thomas Richard Niethammer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: Is it likely to become a saviour of large-sized and full-thickness cartilage defect in young adult knee?

Authors:  Chi Zhang; You-Zhi Cai; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Matrix based autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents: a match paired analysis in a follow-up over three years post-operation.

Authors:  Thomas Richard Niethammer; Martin Holzgruber; Mehmet Fatih Gülecyüz; Patrick Weber; Matthias Frank Pietschmann; Peter Ernst Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Osteochondritis Dissecans in the Knee of Skeletally Immature Patients: Rates of Persistent Pain, Osteoarthritis, and Arthroplasty at Mean 14-Years' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mario Hevesi; Thomas L Sanders; Ayoosh Pareek; Todd A Milbrandt; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Daniel B F Saris; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian Godshaw; Nicholas Kolodychuk; Gerard K Williams; Benjamin Browning; Deryk Jones
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.