Literature DB >> 24595249

Intrathecal injection of human umbilical cord blood stem cells attenuates spinal cord ischaemic compromise in rats.

Gustavo Ieno Judas1, Sueli Gomes Ferreira1, Rafael Simas1, Paulina Sannomiya1, Anderson Benício1, Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva1, Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira2.   

Abstract

OBECTIVES: Spinal cord ischaemia with resulting paraplegia remains a devastating and unpredictable complication after thoraco-abdominal aortic surgery. With the advent of stem cell therapy and its potential to induce nervous tissue regeneration processes, the interest in the use of these cells as a treatment for neurological disorders has increased. Human stem cells, derived from the umbilical cord, are one of the strong candidates used in cell therapy for spinal cord injury because of weak immunogenicity and ready availability. We sought to evaluate the use of human umbilical cord blood stem cells (HUCBSCs) to attenuate the neurological effects of spinal cord ischaemia induced by high thoracic aorta occlusion.
METHODS: Forty Wistar rats were randomized to receive intrathecal injection of 10 µl phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution containing 1 × 10(4) HUCBSCs, 30 min before (Tpre group: n = 10) and 30 min after (Tpos group: n = 10) descending thoracic aorta occlusion by intraluminal balloon during 12 min. Control groups received only PBS solution (Cpre group: n = 10; and Cpos group: n = 10). During a 28-day observational period, motor function was assessed by a functional grading scale (Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan). Segments of thoracolumbar spinal cord specimens were analysed for histological and immunohistochemical assessment for detection and quantification of human haematopoietic cells (CD45(+)) and apoptosis (transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick-end labelling).
RESULTS: Overall mortality was 12 animals (30%). Therefore, the observational sample was composed of 28 animals. All groups showed similar incidence of paraplegia and mortality. The mean motor function scores showed no difference during time between the animals of each group, excepting for the Tpos group, which improved from 8.14 (±8.6) to 14.28 (±9.8) (P < 0.01). A treatment-by-time interaction was detected among animals that received HUCBSCs 30 min after ischaemia, with BBB scores higher from Days 14 to 28 compared with the first observational day with statistical difference (P = 0.01). Number of viable neurons was higher in the Tpos group (P = 0.14) and the incidence of apoptosis was lower in the same animals (P = 0.048), but showed no difference with its respective control. We confirmed the presence of CD45(+) cells 4 weeks after intrathecal injection in both therapeutic groups but mainly in the Tpos group.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal transplantation of HUCBSCs is feasible, and it improved spinal cord function, when they were delivered 30 min after spinal cord ischaemia, in a model of endovascular descending thoracic aorta occlusion in rats. Human umbilical cord blood is one of the potentially useful sources of stem cells for therapy of spinal cord ischaemia.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paraplegia; Spinal cord ischaemia; Stem cells; Thoracic aortic aneurysm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595249     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  6 in total

1.  Method of long-term, recurrent, intracerebroventricular infusion of cellular therapy in mice.

Authors:  Chao-Hsien Chen; Michael A Curran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Comparison of intraspinal and intrathecal implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursors for the treatment of spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Takashi Amemori; Jiri Ruzicka; Nataliya Romanyuk; Meena Jhanwar-Uniyal; Eva Sykova; Pavla Jendelova
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity?

Authors:  Harvinder Singh Chhabra; Kanchan Sarda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Liyi Huang; Chenying Fu; Feng Xiong; Chengqi He; Quan Wei
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  MiR-128-3p Alleviates Spinal Cord Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Associated Neuroinflammation and Cellular Apoptosis via SP1 Suppression in Rat.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Fengshou Chen; Bo Fang; Zaili Zhang; Yan Dong; Xiangyi Tong; Hong Ma
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Gang-Un Kim; Soo-Eun Sung; Kyung-Ku Kang; Joo-Hee Choi; Sijoon Lee; Minkyoung Sung; Seung Yun Yang; Seul-Ki Kim; Young In Kim; Ju-Hyeon Lim; Min-Soo Seo; Gun Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.