OBJECTIVE: A primary challenge in identifying replicable pharmacogenomic markers from clinical genomewide association study (GWAS) trials in oncology is the difficulty in performing a second large clinical trial with the same drugs and dosage regimen. We sought to overcome this challenge by incorporating GWAS results from cell-based studies using the same chemotherapy as a clinical cohort. METHODS: In this study, we test whether the overlap between genetic variants identified in a preclinical study and a clinical study on capecitabine is more than expected by chance. A GWAS of capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity was performed in 164 lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from the CEU HapMap population and compared with a GWAS of hand-foot syndrome (HFS), the most frequent capecitabine-induced adverse drug reaction, in Spanish breast and colorectal cancer patients (n=160) treated with capecitabine. RESULTS: We observed an overlap of 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity (P<0.001) in lymphoblastoid cell lines and HFS (P<0.05) in patients, which is a greater overlap than expected by chance (genotype-phenotype permutation empirical P=0.015). Ten tag single nucleotide polymorphisms, which cover the overlap loci, were genotyped in a second patient cohort (n=85) and one of them, rs9936750, was associated with capecitabine-induced HFS (P=0.0076). CONCLUSION: The enrichment results imply that cellular models of capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity may capture components of the underlying polygenic architecture of related toxicities in patients.
OBJECTIVE: A primary challenge in identifying replicable pharmacogenomic markers from clinical genomewide association study (GWAS) trials in oncology is the difficulty in performing a second large clinical trial with the same drugs and dosage regimen. We sought to overcome this challenge by incorporating GWAS results from cell-based studies using the same chemotherapy as a clinical cohort. METHODS: In this study, we test whether the overlap between genetic variants identified in a preclinical study and a clinical study on capecitabine is more than expected by chance. A GWAS of capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity was performed in 164 lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from the CEU HapMap population and compared with a GWAS of hand-foot syndrome (HFS), the most frequent capecitabine-induced adverse drug reaction, in Spanish breast and colorectal cancerpatients (n=160) treated with capecitabine. RESULTS: We observed an overlap of 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity (P<0.001) in lymphoblastoid cell lines and HFS (P<0.05) in patients, which is a greater overlap than expected by chance (genotype-phenotype permutation empirical P=0.015). Ten tag single nucleotide polymorphisms, which cover the overlap loci, were genotyped in a second patient cohort (n=85) and one of them, rs9936750, was associated with capecitabine-induced HFS (P=0.0076). CONCLUSION: The enrichment results imply that cellular models of capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity may capture components of the underlying polygenic architecture of related toxicities in patients.
Authors: Maarten J Deenen; Jolien Tol; Artur M Burylo; Valerie D Doodeman; Anthonius de Boer; Andrew Vincent; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Paul H M Smits; Jos H Beijnen; Cornelis J A Punt; Jan H M Schellens; Annemieke Cats Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A V Marzano; M Cugno; V Trevisan; R Lazzari; D Fanoni; E Berti; C Crosti Journal: Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol Date: 2011 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.219
Authors: N Ribelles; J López-Siles; A Sánchez; E González; M J Sánchez; F Carabantes; P Sánchez-Rovira; A Márquez; R Dueñas; I Sevilla; E Alba Journal: Curr Drug Metab Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Peter H O'Donnell; Amy L Stark; Eric R Gamazon; Heather E Wheeler; Bridget E McIlwee; Lidija Gorsic; Hae Kyung Im; R Stephanie Huang; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jacob F Degner; John C Marioni; Athma A Pai; Joseph K Pickrell; Everlyne Nkadori; Yoav Gilad; Jonathan K Pritchard Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Seth E Karol; Wenjian Yang; Colton Smith; Cheng Cheng; Clinton F Stewart; Sharyn D Baker; John T Sandlund; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Michael W Bishop; Alberto S Pappo; Sima Jeha; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael T Eadon; Ronald J Hause; Amy L Stark; Ying-Hua Cheng; Heather E Wheeler; Kimberly S Burgess; Eric A Benson; Patrick N Cunningham; Robert L Bacallao; Pierre C Dagher; Todd C Skaar; M Eileen Dolan Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Matthew Traylor; Jemma L Walker; Adele A Corrigan; Monica A Hernandez; Stephen J Newhouse; Amos A Folarin; Hamel Patel; Paul J Ross; Jeremy D Sanderson; James Spicer; Natalie J Prescott; Christopher G Mathew; Anthony M Marinaki; Cathryn M Lewis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240