| Literature DB >> 24594627 |
Juan F Cardona1, Lucila Kargieman2, Vladimiro Sinay3, Oscar Gershanik2, Carlos Gelormini2, Lucia Amoruso2, María Roca3, David Pineda4, Natalia Trujillo4, Maëva Michon5, Adolfo M García2, Daniela Szenkman2, Tristán Bekinschtein6, Facundo Manes7, Agustín Ibáñez8.
Abstract
Although motor-language coupling is now being extensively studied, its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this sense, a crucial opposition has emerged between the non-representational and the representational views of embodiment. The former posits that action language is grounded on the non-brain motor system directly engaged by musculoskeletal activity - i.e., peripheral involvement of ongoing actions. Conversely, the latter proposes that such grounding is afforded by the brain's motor system - i.e., activation of neural areas representing motor action. We addressed this controversy through the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE) paradigm, which induces a contextual coupling of motor actions and verbal processing. ACEs were measured in three patient groups - early Parkinson's disease (EPD), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and acute transverse myelitis (ATM) patients - as well as their respective healthy controls. NMO and ATM constitute models of injury to non-brain motor areas and the peripheral motor system, whereas EPD provides a model of brain motor system impairment. In our study, EPD patients exhibited impaired ACE and verbal processing relative to healthy participants, NMO, and ATM patients. These results indicate that the processing of action-related words is mainly subserved by a cortico-subcortical motor network system, thus supporting a brain-based embodied view on action language. More generally, our findings are consistent with contemporary perspectives for which action/verb processing depends on distributed brain networks supporting context-sensitive motor-language coupling.Entities:
Keywords: ATM; Action language; EPD; Embodied cognition; NMO; Representations
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24594627 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cognition ISSN: 0010-0277