Literature DB >> 24594496

Mal de debarquement, motion sickness and the effect of an artificial horizon.

Dror Tal1, Guy Wiener1, Avi Shupak2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to unfamiliar motion patterns commonly results in motion sickness and a false perception of motion, termed mal de debarquement, on the return to stable conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether motion sickness severity is correlated with the duration and severity of mal de debarquement; to study the possible preventive effect of projecting earth-referenced scenes (an artificial horizon) during exposure to motion on the development of mal de debarquement.
METHODS: Thirty subjects were exposed to the recorded motion profile of a boat in a 3-degrees-of-freedom ship motion simulator. During the simulated voyage, the study participants were repeatedly put through a performance test battery and completed a motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire, while self-referenced and earth-referenced scenes were projected inside the simulator cabin. Six hours post disembarkation, subjects completed a questionnaire on mal de debarquement duration and severity.
RESULTS: Mal de debarquement, mostly of mild severity, was reported following 59% of the exposures to the provocative motion profile, and in 79% of cases lasted less than 6 hours. The incidence of mal de debarquement, its duration, and the severity of symptoms did not differ between the various artificial horizon projection modes. Significant correlations were found between motion sickness severity and the duration and severity of the mal de debarquement that followed.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant correlations found between motion sickness severity and mal de debarquement duration and severity imply that both syndromes might stem from a failure to adapt to new motion conditions. There is a disparity between the previously reported reduction in motion sickness symptoms by an artificial horizon, and its failure to influence the duration and symptoms of mal de debarquement. This might be explained by the different response in the two syndromes, physical versus cognitive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mal de debarquement; motion perception; motion sickness; prevention; questionnaires; vestibular organs

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24594496     DOI: 10.3233/VES-130505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Mal de debarquement syndrome: new insights.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Letter to the Editor: comment and erratum to "Mal de debarquement syndrome: a systematic review".

Authors:  Angelique Van Ombergen; Floris L Wuyts; Yoon-Hee Cha
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Mal de Debarquement Syndrome: A Rare Entity-A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Veronica Nwagwu; Rakesh Patel; Jerome Okudo
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-05

Review 4.  Mal de debarquement syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angelique Van Ombergen; Vincent Van Rompaey; Leen K Maes; Paul H Van de Heyning; Floris L Wuyts
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Examination of Current Treatments and Symptom Management Strategies Used by Patients With Mal De Debarquement Syndrome.

Authors:  Josephine M Canceri; Rachael Brown; Shaun R Watson; Cherylea J Browne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Mal de débarquement syndrome diagnostic criteria: Consensus document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; Robert W Baloh; Catherine Cho; Måns Magnusson; Jae-Jin Song; Michael Strupp; Floris Wuyts; Jeffrey P Staab
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.354

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.