Literature DB >> 24594092

Level of consciousness on admission to a Heart Attack Centre is a predictor of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Charles D Deakin1, Rachael Fothergill2, Fionna Moore3, Lynne Watson2, Mark Whitbread4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the neurological status at the time of handover from the ambulance crew to a Heart Attack Centre (HAC) in patients who have achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and subsequent outcome, in the context of current treatment standards, is unknown.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients treated by London Ambulance Service (LAS) from 1(st) April 2011 to 31(st) March 2013 admitted to a HAC in Greater London was undertaken. Neurological status (A - alert; V - responding to voice; P - responding to pain; U - unresponsive) recorded by the ambulance crew on handover was compared with length of hospital stay and survival to hospital discharge.
RESULTS: A total of 475 sequential adult cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac origin, achieving ROSC on admission to a HAC were identified. Outcome data was available for 452 patients, of whom 253 (56.0%) survived to discharge. Level of consciousness on admission to the HAC was a predictor of duration of hospital stay (P<0.0001) and survival to hospital discharge (P<0.0001). Of those presenting with a shockable rhythm, 32.3% (120/371) were 'A' or 'V', compared with 9.1% (9/99) of those with non-shockable rhythms (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Patients with shockable rhythms achieving ROSC are more likely to be conscious (A or V) compared with those with non-shockable rhythms. Most patients who are conscious on admission to the HAC will survive, compared with approximately half of those who are unconscious (P or U), suggesting that critical care is generally appropriate at all levels of consciousness if ROSC has been achieved.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulance; Cardiac arrest; Level of consciousness; Out-of-hospital; Outcome; Return of spontaneous circulation; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24594092     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  4 in total

Review 1.  The present and future of cardiac arrest care: international experts reach out to caregivers and healthcare authorities.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Robert A Berg; Clifton W Callaway; Laurie J Morrison; Vinay Nadkarni; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Markus B Skrifvars; Jasmeet Soar; Kjetil Sunde; Alain Cariou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Airway and ventilation management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and after successful resuscitation.

Authors:  Christopher Newell; Scott Grier; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Postcardiac Arrest Neuroprognostication Practices: A Survey of Brazilian Physicians.

Authors:  Sonya E Zhou; Mary M Barden; Emily J Gilmore; Octavio M Pontes-Neto; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Pedro Kurtz; Jamary Oliveira-Filho; Pedro Telles Cougo-Pinto; Fernando G Zampieri; Nicholas J Napoli; Jeremy J Theriot; David M Greer; Carolina B Maciel
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-01-11

4.  A service evaluation of transport destination and outcome of patients with post-ROSC STEMI in an English ambulance service.

Authors:  Anthony Platt
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2020-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.