| Literature DB >> 24593143 |
James S Woods1, Nicholas J Heyer, Joan E Russo, Michael D Martin, Pradeep B Pillai, Theodor K Bammler, Federico M Farin.
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) is neurotoxic and children may be particularly susceptible to this effect. A current major challenge is identification of children who may be uniquely susceptible to Hg toxicity because of genetic disposition. This study examined the hypothesis that genetic variants of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) that are reported to alter neurobehavioral functions that are also affected by Hg in adults might modify the adverse neurobehavioral effects of Hg exposure in children. Five hundred and seven children, 8-12 yr of age at baseline, participated in a clinical trial to evaluate the neurobehavioral effects of Hg from dental amalgam tooth fillings. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and at seven subsequent annual intervals for neurobehavioral performance and urinary Hg levels. Following the clinical trial, genotyping assays were performed for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of COMT rs4680, rs4633, rs4818, and rs6269 on biological samples provided by 330 of the trial participants. Regression-modeling strategies were employed to evaluate associations between allelic status, Hg exposure, and neurobehavioral test outcomes. Similar analysis was performed using haplotypes of COMT SNPs. Among girls, few interactions for Hg exposure and COMT variants were found. In contrast, among boys, numerous gene-Hg interactions were observed between individual COMT SNPs, as well as with a common COMT haplotype affecting multiple domains of neurobehavioral function. These findings suggest increased susceptibility to the adverse neurobehavioral effects of Hg among children with common genetic variants of COMT, and may have important implications for strategies aimed at protecting children from the potential health risks associated with Hg exposure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24593143 PMCID: PMC3967503 DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2014.867210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A ISSN: 0098-4108
Neurobehavioral Tests Assessed With Mean Scores for Year 7 (Final Year of Clinical Trial)
| Test/domain | Test abbreviation | Measure | Boys, | Girls, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attention/Concentration (7 tests) | ||||
| Stroop Test–Color, | Stroop-Color | Number correct ↑ | 66.16 (11.67) | 69.25 (10.39) |
| Word | Stroop-Word | Number correct ↑ | 89.93 (15.17) | 91.54 (15.19) |
| Color-Word | Stroop-ColWd | Number correct ↑ | 41.74 (9.76) | 43.93 (8.73) |
| WAIS-III–Digit Span | Digit Span | Number correct ↑ | 14.30 (3.67) | 14.14 (2.76) |
| WAIS-III–Spatial Span | Spatial Span | Number correct ↑ | 15.83 (3.03) | 15.61 (3.12) |
| Adult Trails A | Trails A | Time (sec) ↓ | 26.43 (10.63) | 30.25 (11.42) |
| Adult Trails B | Trails B | Time (sec) ↓ | 65.97 (26.94) | 63.10 (23.80) |
| Visual-Spatial (3 tests) | ||||
| Standard Reaction Time | SRT | Time (sec) ↓ | 0.74 (0.15) | 0.77 (0.13) |
| WAIS III–Digit Symbol | Digit Symbol | Number correct ↑ | 72.02 (16.48) | 76.58 (13.85) |
| WAIS-III–Symbol Search | Symbol Search | Number correct ↑ | 32.99 (8.82) | 34.59 (8.01) |
| Learning & Memory (8 tests) | ||||
| RAVLT Trial 1–List A | RAVLT 1 | Number correct ↑ | 5.62 (1.49) | 6.12 (1.86) |
| Trial 5–List A (fifth repetition) | RAVLT 5 | Number correct ↑ | 11.23 (2.20) | 11.55 (2.23) |
| Trial 6–List B | RAVLT 6 | Number correct ↑ | 4.73 (1.38) | 5.28 (1.56) |
| Trial 7–List A/Post B | RAVLT 7 | Number correct ↑ | 9.85 (2.57) | 10.23 (2.48) |
| Trial 8–List A after 20′ | RAVLT 8 | Number correct ↑ | 9.29 (2.73) | 10.08 (2.76) |
| Trials 1–5 | RAVLT 1–5 | Number correct ↑ | 45.41 (9.58) | 48.01 (9.37) |
| WMS-III–Visual Reproductions–Immediate | VisRep-Imm | Number correct ↑ | 34.69 (4.66) | 36.62 (2.97) |
| WMS-III–Visual Reproductions–Delayed | VisRep-Del | Number correct ↑ | 32.01 (6.98) | 34.93 (4.02) |
| Motor (4 tests) | ||||
| WRAVMA–Pegs–Dominant Hand | Pegs-Dom | Number Pegs ↑ | 47.35 (8.51) | 49.92 (6.28) |
| WRAVMA–Pegs–Non Dominant Hand | Pegs-NonDom | Number Pegs ↑ | 44.37 (7.59) | 45.03 (6.10) |
| Finger Tapping–Dominant Hand | FT-Dom | Number Taps ↑ | 52.66 (5.53) | 48.55 (5.83) |
| Finger Tapping–Non Dominant Hand | FT-NonDom | Number Taps ↑ | 46.54 (5.79) | 42.53 (5.78) |
Arrows show direction of improved performance.
Study Population Characteristics for Participants at Entry (Baseline) and in Year 2 and Year 7
| Boys | Girls | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry. | Year 2. | Year 7. | Entry. | Year 2. | Year 7. | |
| Characteristic | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) |
| Age | 10.17 (.82) | 12.22 (.84) | 17.15 (.85) | 10.14 (.93) | 12.15 (.96) | 17.06 (1.03) |
| School year | 4.05 (1.05) | 5.78 (1.21) | 9.40 (2.05) | 4.14 (1.07) | 5.91 (1.16) | 9.86 (1.51) |
| Non-Verbal IQ (at entry only) | 85.96 (9.96) | — | — | 85.54 (10.23) | — | — |
| Urinary mercury concentrations | ||||||
| Unadjusted urinary Hg | 1.45 (1.13) | 2.17 (2.14) | 1.86 (5.35) | 1.52 (1.13) | 2.83 (3.02) | 2.37 (2.61) |
| | ||||||
| Ln HgU (creatinine corrected) | 0.89 (0.42) | 1.02 (0.49) | 0.62 (0.48) | 0.94 (0.48) | 1.18 (0.57) | 0.83 (0.56) |
| | ||||||
| Calculated cumulative Hg measure | — | — | 2.48 (0.50) | — | — | 2.74 (0.55) |
| | — | — | — | — | ||
µg Hg/L.
ln(µg Hg/g creatinine + 1).
ln[Σµg Hg/g creatinine) + 1].
Acute Hg Dose-Response Effects in Year 2 Among Boys and Girls by WT or Mut Allelic Status for COMT SNPs
| rs4680 | rs4633 | rs4818 | rs6269 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | Mut | WT | Mut | WT | Mut | WT | Mut | |||||||||
| Measure | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | ||||||||
| Boys | ||||||||||||||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color | −1.58 (2.50) | −.09 (.53) | −9.32 (4.09) | −1.58 (2.56) | −.09 (.54) | −7.60 (3.70) | ||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Word | −3.83 (3.57) | −.15 (.29) | −12.43 (6.21) | |||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color-Word | 1.22 (1.94) | .09 (.54) | −7.92 (2.76) | 1.35 (1.96) | .10 (.49) | −7.98 (2.73) | 3.43 (2.42) | .25 (.17) | −5.31 (2.59) | |||||||
| WAIS-III – Digit Span | −.56 (.65) | −.12 (.40) | −2.11 (.93) | −.58 (.68) | −.13 (.40) | −2.04 (.98) | −.74 (.86) | −.16 (.40) | −1.72 (.79) | |||||||
| Learning & Memory | ||||||||||||||||
| RAVLT–Trial 5: List A | .25 (.64) | .06 (.32) | −2.66 (1.08) | .18 (.66) | .04 (.79) | −2.70 (1.06) | −.01 (.78) | −.00 (.99) | −2.00 (.78) | |||||||
| RAVLT–Trial 6: List B | .29 (.37) | .11 (.44) | −1.68 (.69) | .22 (.37) | .09 (.56) | −1.65 (.69) | ||||||||||
| RAVLT–Trial 7: List A post B | .29 (.76) | .06 (.71) | −2.83 (1.19) | .24 (.79) | .04 (.76) | −2.80 (1.16) | −.02 (1.02) | −.00 (.98) | −1.96 (.94) | |||||||
| RAVLT–Trial 8: A post 20′ | −.07 (.71) | −.02 (.92) | −3.70 (1.48) | −.17 (.72) | −.03 (.82) | −3.69 (1.44) | −.23 (.95) | −.04 (.81) | −2.63 (1.04) | |||||||
| RAVLT–Trials 1–5: Sum | −1.17 (2.13) | −.08 (.58) | −12.21 (4.26) | −1.52 (2.13) | −.11 (.48) | −12.38 (4.20) | −3.71 (2.47) | −.27 (.14) | −8.41 (3.00) | |||||||
| Motor | ||||||||||||||||
| Finger Tapping – Dominant | −1.40 (1.60) | −.12 (.38) | 4.39 (1.71) | |||||||||||||
| Girls | ||||||||||||||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color | −.37 (1.84) | −.03 (.84) | 8.39 (3.16) | |||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Word | −2.83 (3.58) | −.11 (.43) | 11.90 (4.68) | |||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color-Word | −1.06 (1.53) | .10 (.49) | 4.84 (1.85) | |||||||||||||
| Trails A | 3.03 (2.05) | .20 (.15) | 7.49 (1.51) | 2.53 (1.95) | .18 (.20) | 6.18 (2.00) | ||||||||||
| Trails B | 2.53 (3.50) | .10 (.47) | 6.52 (2.81) | 2.53 (3.50) | .10 (.47) | 6.52 (2.81) | ||||||||||
| Learning & Memory | ||||||||||||||||
| RAVLT–Trial 6: List B | .73 (.46) | .27 (.12) | .81 (.37) | |||||||||||||
Note. Values in bold signify p ≤ 0.05 in the direction of impaired performance with increasing Hg exposure. Values in signify p ≤ .05 in direction of improved performance.
Distribution of Three COMT Variants Among Boys
| COMTrs4680 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys at entry | G/G | G/A | A/A | Total | |
| COMTrs4633 | C/C | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| C/T | 3 | 82 | 2 | 87 | |
| 0 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 54 | 82 | 163 | ||
| COMTrs6269 | A/A | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| A/G | 16 | 67 | 2 | 85 | |
| 3 | 15 | ||||
| Total | 54 | 82 | 163 | ||
Chronic Hg Dose-Response Effects in Year 7 Among Boys and Girls by WT or Mut Allelic Status for COMT SNPs
| rs4680 | rs4633 | rs4818 | rs6269 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | WT | Mut | WT | Mut | WT | Mut | WT | Mut | ||||||||
| Measure | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | ||||||||
| Boys | ||||||||||||||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color | −7.20 (3.94) | −.23 (.18) | −13.79 (6.23) | |||||||||||||
| WAIS–III – Spatial Span | −1.24 (.97) | −.21 (.21) | −5.05 (1.95) | −1.27 (.99) | −.22 (.21) | −4.58 (1.84) | ||||||||||
| Visual–Spatial | ||||||||||||||||
| WAIS–III – Digit Symbol | −6.74 (5.58) | −.20 (.24) | −32.46 (11.28) | −6.76 (5.74) | −.20 (.25) | −35.71 (10.87) | −7.96 (8.45) | −.21 (.36) | −17.92 (6.80) | |||||||
| WAIS–III – Symbol Search | −2.89 (2.28) | −.21 (.21) | −16.49 (5.52) | −2.92 (2.30) | −.22 (.21) | −16.19 (5.53) | −5.35 (3.11) | −.35 (.10) | −8.48 (3.83) | |||||||
| Motor | ||||||||||||||||
| WRAVMA –Pegs – Dominant | −6.15 (2.50) | 3.72 (4.84) | .23 (.46) | |||||||||||||
| Girls | ||||||||||||||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||||||||||||||
| Stroop Test: Color | 8.61 (2.70) | 6.60 (3.70) | .36 (.09) | |||||||||||||
| Adult Trails A | −3.06 (2.57) | −.18 (.24) | 9.24 (6.21) | .41 (.16) | −3.08 (2.73) | −.17 (.27) | 10.62 (6.46) | .44 (.13) | ||||||||
| Learning & Memory | ||||||||||||||||
| RAVLT – Trial 8: A post 20′ | −.58 (.61) | −.15 (.35) | −2.29 (1.06) | |||||||||||||
Note. Values in bold signify p ≤ 0.05 in the direction of impaired performance with increasing Hg exposure. Values in bold italics signify p ≤ .05 in direction of improved performance with increasing Hg exposure.
FIGURE 1.Haplotype block structure of the COMT gene in study subjects. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot statistics of rs6269, rs4633, rs4818, and 4680. L1 = Locus 1; L2 = Locus 2; D′ = D prime, a measure of pairwise LD; LOD (logarithm of odds) = LOD score; r2 = goodness of fit. Haplotype block structure is as depicted by Haploview. Values for D′ (×100) are shown in shaded cells; cells with D′ = 1.00 are shaded without values indicated.
Acute Hg Dose-Response Effects Among Boys and Girls With ACGG (Group A) or GTCA (Group B) COMT haplotype
| Haplotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCGGval-GCGGval (Group A) | ATCAmet-ATCAmet (Group B) | |||
| Measure | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | ||
| Boys | ||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||
| Stroop Test: Color-Word | 4.62 (2.95) | .34 (.13) | −8.38 (3.25) | |
| WAIS–III Digit Span | −.92 (.77) | −.27 (.24) | −2.43 (1.01) | |
| Learning & Memory | ||||
| RAVLT–Trial 5: List A | .84 (.84) | .23 (.32) | −2.55 (1.16) | |
| RAVLT–Trial 6: List B | −.07 (.53) | −.03 (.90) | −1.48 (.70) | |
| RAVLT–Trial 8: A post 20′ | 1.03 (1.01) | .23 (.32) | −3.17 (1.51) | |
| RAVLT–Trials 1–5: Sum | −.28 (2.93) | −.02 (.92) | −11.79 (4.61) | |
| Girls | ||||
| Attention | ||||
| Trails A | 3.32 (3.47) | .21 (.36) | 6.96 (1.78) | |
| Motor | ||||
| Finger Tapping–Non-Dominant Hand | −.27 (1.93) | −.03 (.89) | −4.18 (1.30) | |
| WRAVMA–Pegs–Dominant Hand | 1.84 (2.06) | .21 (.38) | −.60 (2.27) | |
Note. Values in bold signify p ≤ .05 with increasing Hg exposure.
Chronic Hg Dose-Response Effects Among Boys and Girls With ACGG (Group A) or GTCA (Group B) COMT Haplotype
| Haplotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCGGval-GCGGval (Group A) | ATCAmet-ATCAmet (Group B) | |||
| Measure | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | ||
| Boys | ||||
| Attention/Concentration | ||||
| Stroop Test: Color | −3.87 (7.11) | −.16 (.60) | −13.08 (6.39) | |
| WAIS–III–Spatial Span | .56 (1.29) | .13 (.87) | −4.89 (1.84) | |
| Visual-Spatial | ||||
| WAIS-III–Digit Symbol | .80 (11.16) | .02 (.94) | −32.90 (10.25) | |
| WAIS-III–Symbol Search | −.30 (4.16) | −.02 (.94) | −16.70 (5.71) | |
Note. Values in bold signify p ≤ .05 with increasing Hg exposure.
FIGURE 2.Associations between performance on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) Trials 1–5: Sum of Learning & Memory and acute Hg exposure among boys. Scatter plots and simple linear regression fit lines of RAVLT Trials 1–5: Sum test scores by acute Hg exposure (ln[HgU + 1]) are plotted to distinguish boys with the COMT Group B haplotype Mut (ATCAmet-ATCAmet) (open circles, solid line) versus those with Not Group B haplotype status (closed circles, dashed line). The linear slope r2 values for Group B and Not Group B are .126 and 2.562E-4, respectively (p < .02). Thus, while acute Hg exposure explains 12.6% of the performance variation among boys with the Group B haplotype, Hg explains virtually no variation among those with Not Group B status.
FIGURE 3.Associations between performance on the WAIS-III Digit Symbol test of Visual-Spatial acuity and chronic cumulative Hg exposure among boys. Scatter plots and simple linear regression fit lines of WAIS-III Digit Symbol test scores by chronic cumulative Hg exposure (ln[(ΣHgU) + 1]) are plotted to distinguish boys with the COMT Group B haplotype Mut (ATCAmet-ATCAmet) (open circles, solid line) versus those with Not Group B haplotype status (closed circles, dashed line). Linear slope r2 values for Group B and Not Group B are .270 and .007, respectively (p < .006). Thus, while chronic Hg exposure explains 27% of the performance variation among boys with the Group B haplotype, it explains less than 1% of variation among those with Not Group B status.