| Literature DB >> 24593140 |
Elias Mpofu1, Fidelis Nkomazana, Jabulani A Muchado, Lovemore Togarasei, Jeffrey Bart Bingenheimer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a huge interest by faith-based organizations (FBOs) in sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere in HIV prevention interventions that build on the religious aspects of being. Successful partnerships between the public health services and FBOs will require a better understanding of the conceptual framing of HIV prevention by FBOS to access for prevention intervention, those concepts the churches of various denominations and their members would support or endorse. This study investigated the conceptual framing of HIV prevention among church youths in Botswana;--a country with one of the highest HIV prevalence in the world.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24593140 PMCID: PMC3973985 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Participant characteristics (N =213)
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | | | | Totals |
| | Male | 16 (26) | 53(34)) | 69(32) |
| | Female | 45 (74) | 100 (66) | 145 (68) |
| Age | | | | |
| | Younger (<18 years) | 4(6) | 55(36) | 59(29) |
| Older (18 years and above) | 57(94) | 97(64) | 154(72) | |
Note. The numbers in brackets are column percentages with and without first sex.
Number of participants who took the faith belief or personal belief statement probe for the brainstorming and self-reporting on first sex (N = 213)
| C = Yes (n = 61) | 28 (25) | 33 (32) |
| D = No (n = 152) | 82(75) | 76(68) |
| Totals | 110 (51) | 103(49) |
Note. The numbers in brackets are column percentages. AC = number of participants with first who took the faith oriented statement probe self-reporting with first sex. BC = number of who took the faith oriented statement probe self-reporting with first sex; AD = number of participants who took the personal belief statement probe self-reporting with no first sex; BD = number of participants who took the personal belief statement probe self-reporting with no first sex.
Figure 1Cluster rating map for messages perceived to be received by Botswana Pentecostal youths orphan to influenced their sexual decisions. Participants rated message statements on the criterion of importance to their HIV prevention decisions. Higher stacked clusters indicate those considered particularly important to the youth HIV prevention. With an observed sten statistic of .27, the five cluster solution explains 73% the variance in the data; - suggesting a high stability or repeatability with a similar sample of church youths.
Sample statements per concept cluster with means and standard deviations by sexual experience
| | Mean score and SD | | Mean Score and SD | ||||
| 43 | Trust in God always | 4.73 (.66) | 4.77(.83) | 5 | Caring for those with HIV and AIDS | 4.27( 1.08) | 4.43(1.11) |
| 38 | Protecting and valuing your virginity | 4.42(1.13) | 4.73(.98) | 12 | Voluntary testing and counselling | 4.04(1.27) | 4.16(1.18) |
| 22 | Say no to sex before marriage | 4.60(1.21) | 4.63(1.15) | 1 | Sexually transmitted infections | 4.19(1.29) | 3.98(1.13) |
| 50 | Ask for partner from God | 4.56(1.27) | 4.55(1.34) | 3 | What is HIV and AIDS | 3.81(1.12) | 3.79(1.08) |
| | 4.34(.32) | 4.37(.42) | | 3.52(.47) | 3.65(.39) | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| 31 | Importance of life targets and setting personal goals | 4.35(1.07) | 4.40(1.13) | 39 | Life consequences of unwanted pregnancies | 3.40(1.25) | 3.81(1.21) |
| 19 | Taking responsibility for one’s future | 4.04(1.11) | 4.38(1.15) | 24 | Risks from early involvement in love affairs | 3.83(1.09) | 3.68(1.17) |
| 47 | Aim for a career | 4.15(1.08) | 4.20(1.12) | 30 | Risks from sex for money | 3.15(1.15) | 3.65(1.28) |
| 27 | School first sex after | 4.02(1.31) | 4.18(1.18) | 26 | Proper use of contraceptives | 3.15 (1.16) | 3.29(1.27) |
| | Cluster mean and SD | 3.91(.33) | 4.06*(.23) | | 3.33 (.31) | 3.33(.37) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| 37 | Talk about HIV with peers, teachers and parents | 4.23(1.22) | 4.28(1.03) | | | | |
| 10 | Healthy living | 4.37(1.02) | 4.22(1.13) | | | | |
| 44 | Choose friends wisely | 3.94(1.17) | 4.22(1.24) | | | | |
| 32 | Self-pride and valuing yourself | 3.88(1.21) | 3.79(1.16) | | | | |
| 3.68*(.47) | 3.74(.47) | ||||||
*p < .01.
Mean importance difference scores among secular HIV prevention concept clusters by first sex (N = 133)
| 1. FHIV | .00 | | | | 1. FHIV | .00 | | | | -.13 |
| 3.52 (.47) | 3.65 (.39) | |||||||||
| 2. PED | .19 | .00 | | | 2. PED | .32* | .00 | | | .00 |
| 3.33 (.31) | 3.33 (.37) | |||||||||
| 3. CNS | -.16 | -.35* | .00 | | 3. CNS | -.09 | -.41 | .00 | | -.06 |
| 3.68 (.47) | 3.74 (.47) | |||||||||
| 4. FFC | -39* | -.58* | -.23 | .00 | 4. FFC | -.41* | -0.73 | .32* | .00 | -.15 |
| 3.91(.33) | 4.06 (.23) | |||||||||
Note. The numbers in brackets are standard deviations. FHIV = Facts about HIV and AIDS, PED = Prevention Education, CNS = Community Norms, FFC = Future Focus.
*p < .001.
Mean importance difference scores among secular HIV prevention concept clusters by age (N = 213)
| | | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | |||||||||
| 1. FHIV | .00 | | | | 1. FHIV | .00 | | | | -.41 |
| 3.31 (.52) | 3.72 (.35) | |||||||||
| 2. PED | -.16 | .00 | | | 2. PED | .11 | .00 | | | -.14 |
| 3.47 (.48) | 3.61 (.46) | |||||||||
| 3. CNS | -.09 | .07 | .00 | | 3. CNS | -.05 | -.16 | .00 | | -.37 |
| 3.40 (.60) | 3.77 (.39) | |||||||||
| 4. FFC | .31 | -.45* | -.52* | .00 | 4. FFC | -.26 | .61* | -.21* | .00 | .06 |
| 3.92 (.41) | 3.98 (.33) | |||||||||
Note. The numbers in brackets are standard deviations. FHIV = Facts about HIV and AIDS, PED = Prevention Education, CNS = Community Norms, FFC = Future Focus.
*p < .001.