Literature DB >> 24592985

The comparision of effect of microdose GnRH-a flare-up, GnRH antagonist/aromatase inhibitor letrozole and GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate protocols on IVF outcomes in poor responder patients.

Pinar Ozcan Cenksoy1, Cem Ficicioglu, Ozge Kizilkale, Mehmet Suhha Bostanci, Murat Bakacak, Mert Yesiladali, Cigdem Kaspar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of microdose GnRH-a flare-up, GnRH antagonist/aromatase inhibitor letrozole and GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate protocols on IVF outcomes in poor responder patients.
METHODS: Of 225 patients, 83 patients were in microdose flare-up group (Group 1), 70 patients were in GnRH antagonist/letrozole group (Group 2) and 72 patients were in GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate group (Group 3). Demographic and endocrine characteristics, the total number of oocytes retrieved, cancellation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were collected
Results: Total dosage of gonadotropins (p=0.002) and serum E2 levels on the day of hCG administration (p=0.010) were significantly higher and duration of stimulations (p=0.03) was significantly longer in group 1. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly greater in group 1 and 2 when compare to those of group 3 (p=0,000). There was a trend towards increasing cycle cancellation rates with GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate and GnRH antagonist/letrozole.
CONCLUSION: Our finding suggest that the results of microdose flare-up protocol are better than other two used treatment protocols, in terms of maximum estradiol levels, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and cancellation rate and it still seems to be superior the ovarian stimulation regime for the poor responder patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted Reproductive Technology; infertility; ovulation induction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24592985     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.893571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  9 in total

1.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Man Di; Xiaohong Wang; Jing Wu; Hongya Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Effects of letrozole co-treatment on outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 expected poor responders.

Authors:  Alper Kahraman; Firat Tulek
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients.

Authors:  Helmy Selman; Leonardo Rinaldi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-17

5.  Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Yan Wu; Fu-Chun Zhao; Yong Sun; Pei-Shu Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Effect of adding letrozole to gonadotropin on in vitro fertilization outcomes: An RCT.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Lida Saeed
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Letrozole supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation in expected high responders: a pilot randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Yang; Ge Lin; Guangxiu Lu; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders.

Authors:  Shamim Pilehvari; Ensieh ShahrokhTehraninejad; Batool Hosseinrashidi; Fatemeh Keikhah; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Elham Aziminekoo
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03

9.  Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrija Kumar Datta; Abha Maheshwari; Nirmal Felix; Stuart Campbell; Geeta Nargund
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 15.610

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.