Literature DB >> 24592434

Facing complexity through informed simplifications: a research agenda for aquatic exposure assessment of nanoparticles.

Antonia Praetorius, Rickard Arvidsson, Sverker Molander, Martin Scheringer.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) is a challenging task mainly due to the novel properties of these new materials and the complexity caused by a wide range of particle characteristics, ENP-containing products and possible environmental interactions. We here present a research agenda in which we propose to face the complexity associated with ENP exposure assessment through informed and systematic simplifications. Exposure modelling is presented as a method for addressing complexity by identifying processes dominant for the fate of ENPs in the environment and enabling an iterative learning process by studying different emission and fate scenarios. Furthermore, the use of models is important to highlight most pressing research needs. For this reason, we also strongly encourage improved communication and collaboration between modellers and experimental scientists. Feedback between modellers and experimental scientists is crucial in order to understand the big picture of ENP exposure assessment and to establish common research strategies. Through joint research efforts and projects, the field of ENP exposure assessment can greatly improve and significantly contribute to a comprehensive and systematic risk assessment of ENPs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24592434     DOI: 10.1039/c2em30677h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  5 in total

1.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Elena Semenzin; Bernd Nowack; Neil Hunt; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Araceli Sánchez Jiménez; Robert Landsiedel; Lang Tran; Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Kerstin Hund-Rinke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters.

Authors:  Edward Suhendra; Chih-Hua Chang; Wen-Che Hou; Yi-Chin Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: model definition and evaluation.

Authors:  Johannes A J Meesters; Albert A Koelmans; Joris T K Quik; A Jan Hendriks; Dik van de Meent
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Combining Nanotechnology and Gas Plasma as an Emerging Platform for Cancer Therapy: Mechanism and Therapeutic Implication.

Authors:  Milad Rasouli; Nadia Fallah; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.543

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.