Literature DB >> 24592017

Factors influencing the contraceptive method choice: a university hospital experience.

Korhan Kahraman1, Göksu Göç1, Salih Taşkın1, Pınar Haznedar2, Selen Karagözlü2, Burak Kale2, Zeynep Kurtipek2, Batuhan Ozmen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors influencing behavior of women in choosing contraceptive methods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 4022 women who were admitted to our clinic in a year, were the subjects in this current study for contraception choices. Relationship between the current contraceptive choice and the age, marital status, educational level, gravidity and induced abortions were evaluated.
RESULTS: Current users of any contraceptive methods were found to make up thirty-three percent of the entire study population. The most preferred method of contraception was an intrauterine device (46.4%), followed by, condom (19.2%), coitus interruptus (16.4%), tubal sterilization (11%), oral contraceptives (5.7%) and lastly the "other methods" that consisted of depot injectables and implants (1.2%). Among other contraceptive methods, the condom was found to be used mostly by the younger age group (OR:0.956, 95% CI:0.936-0.976, p<0.001), while tubal sterilization was preferred mainly by the elderly population (p<0.001, OR:1.091, 95% CI:1.062-1.122). Women that have a higher educational level, were found to use OC (76.3%, OR:5.970, 95% CI:3.233-11.022), tubal sterilization (59.6%, OR:4.110, 95% CI:2.694-6.271) and other methods (62.5%, OR:3.279, 95% CI:1.033-10.402) more commonly than the low educational group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that the rates of both contraception utilization and the usage of more effective methods of contraception need to be increased by providing better family planning systems and counselling opportunities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptives; demographic factors; intrauterine device; method choice

Year:  2012        PMID: 24592017      PMCID: PMC3939130          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  9 in total

1.  Contraceptive use in Australia: evidence from the 1995 National Health Survey.

Authors:  F Yusuf; S Siedlecky
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  The quality of family planning services in two low-income districts of Istanbul.

Authors:  J M Turan; A Bulut; H Nalbant
Journal:  Nufusbil Derg       Date:  1997

3.  Contraceptive use in Canada: 1984-1995.

Authors:  K Martin; Z Wu
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

4.  Factors affecting the contraceptive choice in a developing country.

Authors:  S Ozalp; O T Yalcin; H Hassa; B Erbay; N Dalan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 5.  Contraception in Germany: a review.

Authors:  B J Oddens; H M Vemer; A P Visser; E Ketting
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1993-06

6.  Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2010-08

7.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

8.  The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America.

Authors:  J M Paxman; A Rizo; L Brown; J Benson
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug

9.  Women's knowledge, preferences, and practices of modern contraceptive methods in Woreta, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Berhanemeskel Weldegerima; Alem Denekew
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2008-08-08
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Women's empowerment and fertility preferences of married women: analysis of demographic and health survey'2016 in Timor-Leste.

Authors:  Nandeeta Samad; Pranta Das; Segufta Dilshad; Hasan Al Banna; Golam Rabbani; Temitayo Eniola Sodunke; Timothy Craig Hardcastle; Ahsanul Haq; Khandaker Anika Afroz; Rahnuma Ahmad; Mainul Haque
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2022-01-12

2.  Comparison of body weight among hormonal and non-hormonal users in a Malaysian cohort.

Authors:  Hafizah Ibrahim; Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail; Noran Hashim
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-21

3.  Factors associated with contraceptive use among women living with HIV in Canada: a controlled, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chadni C Khondoker; Angela Kaida; Anna Marquez; Amber R Campbell; Hélène C F Côté; Arianne Y Albert; Neora Pick; Evelyn J Maan; Emilie A B Russell; Jerilynn C Prior; Chelsea Elwood; Jason Brophy; Melanie C M Murray
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Determinants of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods utilization among married women of reproductive age groups in western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alemu Sufa Melka; Tesfalidet Tekelab; Desalegn Wirtu
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.