Rachel Dispennette1, David Elliott2, Lisa Nguyen3, Rebecca Richmond4. 1. Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, West Virginia University-Charleston Division, Charleston. 3. Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas. 4. Charleston Area Medical Center-General Division, Charleston.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Determine the association between different measures of drug exposure such as an increased Drug Burden Index (DBI) and a higher Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) score in vulnerable elders and risk of readmission to the hospital. DESIGN: The study is a retrospective cohort comparing ARS and DBI between patients readmitted and not readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of initial admission. Data collected included drugs considered to have anticholinergic, sedative, or both types of properties (Appendix 1), medication strengths, doses per day, patient age, Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) score upon admission, patient diagnoses, and rates of admission. SETTING: Nonprofit, 838-bed, regional health system of four hospitals. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in the study if they were admitted to a hospital floor, were 65 years of age or older, were assessed using VES-13, and did not have routinely visiting family to engage them as observed by floor nurses. INTERVENTIONS: None; retrospective study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmission rate. RESULTS: The mean difference in DBI and ARS scores were higher in the readmitted group. Hydrocodone and hydroxyzine were the most commonly used drugs in the readmitted group that were considered when determining DBI. CONCLUSION: There is a role for screening and clinical intervention in vulnerable elders using DBI and ARS to help identify those at greatest risk for readmission to the hospital.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the association between different measures of drug exposure such as an increased Drug Burden Index (DBI) and a higher Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) score in vulnerable elders and risk of readmission to the hospital. DESIGN: The study is a retrospective cohort comparing ARS and DBI between patients readmitted and not readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of initial admission. Data collected included drugs considered to have anticholinergic, sedative, or both types of properties (Appendix 1), medication strengths, doses per day, patient age, Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) score upon admission, patient diagnoses, and rates of admission. SETTING: Nonprofit, 838-bed, regional health system of four hospitals. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in the study if they were admitted to a hospital floor, were 65 years of age or older, were assessed using VES-13, and did not have routinely visiting family to engage them as observed by floor nurses. INTERVENTIONS: None; retrospective study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmission rate. RESULTS: The mean difference in DBI and ARS scores were higher in the readmitted group. Hydrocodone and hydroxyzine were the most commonly used drugs in the readmitted group that were considered when determining DBI. CONCLUSION: There is a role for screening and clinical intervention in vulnerable elders using DBI and ARS to help identify those at greatest risk for readmission to the hospital.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACOVE = Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders; ADL = Activities of daily living; ARS = Anticholinergic Risk Scale; Anticholinergic; DBI = Drug Burden Index; Drug; Drug burden; Elder; Geriatrics; Readmission; STOPP = Screening Tool for Older Persons of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions; Sedating; TDB = Total drug burden; VES-13 = Vulnerable Elder Survey; VIP = Volunteers Informing Patients; Vulnerable
Authors: Joanne M Sloots; Christopher A Barton; Julie Buckman; Katherine L Bassett; Job van der Palen; Peter A Frith; Tanja W Effing Journal: Chron Respir Dis Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 2.444
Authors: Lisa Kouladjian; Danijela Gnjidic; Timothy F Chen; Arduino A Mangoni; Sarah N Hilmer Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: James A G Crispo; Allison W Willis; Dylan P Thibault; Yannick Fortin; Harlen D Hays; Douglas S McNair; Lise M Bjerre; Dafna E Kohen; Santiago Perez-Lloret; Donald R Mattison; Daniel Krewski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240