Matthew E Prekker1, Heemun Kwok, Jenny Shin, David Carlbom, Andreas Grabinsky, Thomas D Rea. 1. 1Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 3Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 4Emergency Medical Services Division, Public Health-Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA. 5Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Endotracheal intubation success rates in the prehospital setting are variable. Our objective was to describe the challenges encountered and corrective actions taken during the process of endotracheal intubation by paramedics. DESIGN: Analysis of prehospital airway management using a prospective registry that was linked to an emergency medical services administrative database. SETTING: Emergency medical services system serving King County, Washington, 2006-2011. Paramedics in this system have the capability to administer neuromuscular blocking agents to facilitate intubation (i.e., rapid sequence intubation). PATIENTS: A total of 7,523 patients more than 12 years old in whom paramedics attempted prehospital endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An intubation attempt was defined as the introduction of the laryngoscope into the patient's mouth, and the attempt concluded when the laryngoscope was removed from the mouth. Endotracheal intubation was successful on the first attempt in 77% and ultimately successful in 99% of patients (7,433 of 7,523). Paramedics used a rapid sequence intubation strategy on 54% of first attempts. Among the subset with a failed first attempt (n = 1,715), bodily fluids obstructing the laryngeal view (50%), obesity (28%), patient positioning (17%), and facial or spinal trauma (6%) were identified as challenges to intubation. A variety of adjustments were made to achieve intubation success, including upper airway suctioning (used in 43% of attempts resulting in success), patient repositioning (38%), rescue bougie use (19%), operator change (16%), and rescue rapid sequence intubation (6%). Surgical cricothyrotomy (0.4%, n = 27) and bag-valve-mask ventilation (0.8%, n = 60) were rarely performed by paramedics as final rescue airway strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Airway management in the prehospital setting has substantial challenges. Success can require a collection of adjustments that involve equipment, personnel, and medication often in a simultaneous fashion.
OBJECTIVES: Endotracheal intubation success rates in the prehospital setting are variable. Our objective was to describe the challenges encountered and corrective actions taken during the process of endotracheal intubation by paramedics. DESIGN: Analysis of prehospital airway management using a prospective registry that was linked to an emergency medical services administrative database. SETTING: Emergency medical services system serving King County, Washington, 2006-2011. Paramedics in this system have the capability to administer neuromuscular blocking agents to facilitate intubation (i.e., rapid sequence intubation). PATIENTS: A total of 7,523 patients more than 12 years old in whom paramedics attempted prehospital endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An intubation attempt was defined as the introduction of the laryngoscope into the patient's mouth, and the attempt concluded when the laryngoscope was removed from the mouth. Endotracheal intubation was successful on the first attempt in 77% and ultimately successful in 99% of patients (7,433 of 7,523). Paramedics used a rapid sequence intubation strategy on 54% of first attempts. Among the subset with a failed first attempt (n = 1,715), bodily fluids obstructing the laryngeal view (50%), obesity (28%), patient positioning (17%), and facial or spinal trauma (6%) were identified as challenges to intubation. A variety of adjustments were made to achieve intubation success, including upper airway suctioning (used in 43% of attempts resulting in success), patient repositioning (38%), rescue bougie use (19%), operator change (16%), and rescue rapid sequence intubation (6%). Surgical cricothyrotomy (0.4%, n = 27) and bag-valve-mask ventilation (0.8%, n = 60) were rarely performed by paramedics as final rescue airway strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Airway management in the prehospital setting has substantial challenges. Success can require a collection of adjustments that involve equipment, personnel, and medication often in a simultaneous fashion.
Authors: Michael W Hubble; Lawrence Brown; Denise A Wilfong; Attila Hertelendy; Randall W Benner; Michael E Richards Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: M Gausche; R J Lewis; S J Stratton; B E Haynes; C S Gunter; S M Goodrich; P D Poore; M D McCollough; D P Henderson; F D Pratt; J S Seidel Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Steven Talbert; Christine Wargo Detrick; Kimberly Emery; Aurea Middleton; Bassam Abomoelak; Chirajyoti Deb; Devendra I Mehta; Mary Lou Sole Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: D J Lockey; K Crewdson; G Davies; B Jenkins; J Klein; C Laird; P F Mahoney; J Nolan; A Pountney; S Shinde; S Tighe; M Q Russell; J Price; C Wright Journal: Anaesthesia Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 6.955
Authors: Christopher W Root; Oscar J L Mitchell; Russ Brown; Christopher B Evers; Jess Boyle; Cynthia Griffin; Frances Mae West; Edward Gomm; Edward Miles; Barry McGuire; Anand Swaminathan; Jonathan St George; James M Horowitz; James DuCanto Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2020-05-21
Authors: G A Sunde; A Kottmann; J K Heltne; M Sandberg; M Gellerfors; A Krüger; D Lockey; S J M Sollid Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.953