Literature DB >> 24589573

The efficacy of corneal debridement in the treatment of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Sujata Das1, Batriti S Wallang2, Savitri Sharma3, Yogesh V Bhadange2, Praveen K Balne3, Srikant K Sahu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of corneal debridement in the treatment of clinically diagnosed cases of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis.
DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Patients with clinical features such as multifocal, coarse, raised, punctate, round to oval epithelial lesions in the cornea in slit-lamp examination with mild to moderate conjunctival congestion, suggestive of microsporidial superficial keratoconjunctivitis, were included in the prospective study. All patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 patients underwent debridement with the help of a sterile #15 blade on a Bard-Parker handle, whereas only conjunctival swabs were taken from Group 2 patients. All patients were treated with ocular lubricants.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients with clinical features suggestive of microsporidial superficial keratoconjunctivitis were included in the study. The mean age was 34.3 ± 13.6 years (Group 1) and 35.8 ± 16.2 years (Group 2) (P = .59). The mean duration of symptoms was 6.8 ± 3.9 days (Group 1) and 7.2 ± 4.6 days (Group 2) (P = .61). Baseline characteristics showed no difference between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was the time from the presentation to complete resolution (ie, absence of corneal lesions) of the clinical signs and symptoms. The secondary outcomes were final visual acuity and residual corneal side effects and/or scarring, if any. The mean resolution time of the corneal lesions was 5.7 ± 4.0 days (Group 1) and 5.9 ± 3.9 days (Group 2) (P = .83). There was no significant difference in final visual outcome in the 2 groups. No serious side effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: Debridement does not have any significant advantage in terms of resolution of the corneal lesions and final visual outcome in cases of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24589573     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  Modified ulcer debridement in the treatment of the superficial fungal infection of the cornea.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Wang; Dian-Qiang Wang; Xiao-Lin Qi; Jun Cheng; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Case Report: Ocular Microsporidiosis: Case in a Patient Returning from India and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jordan Leroy; Marjorie Cornu; Anne-Sophie Deleplancque; Aldert Bart; Séverine Loridant; Emilie Fréalle; Emmanuel Dutoit; Olivier Gaillot; Tom van Gool; François Puisieux; Pierre Labalette; Boualem Sendid
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Mittanamalli S Sridhar; Bajibhi Shaik
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Punctate epithelial keratoconjunctivitis: A microsporidial infestation.

Authors:  Rohit Dhakal; Muralidhar Ramappa; Savitri Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of Microsporidial Infections of the Cornea.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Shaan N Somani; Kathryn M Shmunes; Ladan Espandar; Nikhil S Gokhale; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.