Literature DB >> 24589446

Implementation of a new CT colonography service: 5 year experience.

P F C Lung1, D Burling2, L Kallarackel1, J Muckian1, R Ilangovan1, A Gupta1, M Marshall1, P Shorvon1, S Halligan3, G Bhatnagar1, P Bassett1, S A Taylor3.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe our experience using a 5 year audit of computed tomography colonography (CTC) practice and identify factors that influence diagnostic performance to guide implementation in other centres.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for CTC at a single institution over a 5 year period were identified, and reporting rates and positive predictive value (PPV) calculated for small polyps, large polyps, and colorectal cancer. Diagnostic performance was compared using the Chi-squared test, and trends over time were examined with logistic regression. The effect of faecal tagging and an intravenous spasmolytic were investigated using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: In total, 4355 CTC examinations were performed. Overall reporting rates and PPV were 17% and 92%, respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) for cancer was 99.9%. A significant decrease in reporting rate (p < 0.001) was accompanied by an increase in PPV for small polyps (p = 0.02) following the introduction of faecal tagging. Adequacy rates for CTC improved over time (96% to 99%), with improved adequacy rates when using a spasmolytic, 98% versus 96% without. A significant difference in reporting rates, but not PPV, was found between radiologists.
CONCLUSION: Accurate colonic investigation using CTC can be delivered safely to a high-risk patient population at a single centre. Faecal tagging and an intravenous spasmolytic improve diagnostic performance.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24589446     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in colorectal imaging.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 2.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  CT colonography: a survey of general practitioners' knowledge and interest.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Andrea Laghi; Mauro Peri; Gianpaolo Cornalba; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for post-investigation colorectal cancer ("interval cancer") after computed tomographic colonography: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Anu Obaro; Thomas Fanshawe; Ulysses S Torres; Rachel Baldwin-Cleland; Steve Halligan; David Burling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Re-initiation of CT colonography services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Preliminary evaluation of safety.

Authors:  David Peprah; Andrew Plumb; Alison Corr; Janice Muckian; Kathryn Smith; Antoni Sergot; Jia Ying Kuah; James Stephenson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.