Literature DB >> 2458936

Clinical behavior of prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase: a comparative study.

J Morote Robles1, A Ruibal Morell, J Palou Redorta, J A de Torres Mateos, A Soler Roselló.   

Abstract

We assayed prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase serum levels in 1,383 patients using a double antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA) 125I. Establishing the upper normal limit in 10 ng/ml for prostatic specific antigen and 2.5 ng/ml for prostatic acid phosphatase, the false positive results were only 1.9 and 5.1% in men with nonprostatic benign or malignant pathology and 0 and 2.2% in women, respectively. We detected false positive levels in 3.5 and 4.7% of the patients with noncomplicated benign prostatic hypertrophy, 64.8 and 19.2% in complicated benign prostatic hypertrophy, 24 and 16% in acute prostatitis and 3.3% in chronic prostatitis for both tumoral markers. The sensibility in patients with prostate cancer was 87.2 and 64.1%, respectively, and there was better correlation with prostatic specific antigen than prostatic acid phosphatase levels on tumoral spread and histologic grading. Finally, the clinical efficacy was higher with prostatic specific antigen and it did not increase with the quantification of both tumoral markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2458936     DOI: 10.1159/000472983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  The correlation between serum prostate specific antigen levels and asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis.

Authors:  Cuneyt Ozden; Ozdem Levent Ozdal; Ozer Guzel; Ozge Han; Selda Seckin; Ali Memis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  John T Wei
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Relationship between serum prostate specific antigen and the pattern of inflammation in both benign and malignant prostatic disease in Middle Eastern men.

Authors:  J T Anim; E O Kehinde; A Prasad; M Sheikh; O A Mojiminiyi; Y Ali; K Al-Awadi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  John T Wei; Ziding Feng; Alan W Partin; Elissa Brown; Ian Thompson; Lori Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Yair Lotan; Adam S Kibel; J Erik Busby; Mohamed Bidair; Daniel W Lin; Samir S Taneja; Rosalia Viterbo; Aron Y Joon; Jackie Dahlgren; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Raised prostate-specific antigen in adenocarcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; H Hibi; K Miyake
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ex Vivo High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning (HRMAS) 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Early Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Annabel Steiner; Stefan Andreas Schmidt; Cara Sophie Fellmann; Johannes Nowak; Chin-Lee Wu; Adam Scott Feldman; Meinrad Beer; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Rational approach to implementation of prostate cancer antigen 3 into clinical care.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rodney L Dunn; Kirk J Wojno; John T Wei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Early detection of prostate cancer: evaluating the diagnostic performance of prostate specific antigen by comparing with histological technique among africans.

Authors:  M A Emokpae; S C Das; T Orok; A Z Mohammed; S A Hassan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.