Literature DB >> 24589357

Clinical performance of serum isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), and its derivatives %p2PSA and the Prostate Health Index, in men aged <60 years: results from a multicentric European study.

Nicola Fossati1, Massimo Lazzeri2, Alexander Haese3, Thomas McNicholas4, Alexandre de la Taille5, Nicolò Maria Buffi2, Giovanni Lughezzani2, Giulio Maria Gadda1, Giuliana Lista1, Alessandro Larcher1, Alberto Abrate1, Francesco Mistretta1, Vittorio Bini6, Joan Palou Redorta7, Markus Graefen3, Giorgio Guazzoni2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives are more accurate than total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) and fPSA as percentage of tPSA (%fPSA) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) in men aged <60 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis consisted of a nested case-control study from the PRO- PSA Multicentric European Study (PROMEtheuS) project. The primary outcomes were measures of sensibility, specificity and accuracy of serum p2PSA, p2PSA as percentage of fPSA (%p2PSA) and Beckman Coulter prostate health index (PHI) in men aged <60 years who had undergone a prostate biopsy. The potential reduction in the number of unnecessary biopsies and the characteristics of the potentially missed PCa cases were reported as secondary outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression models were complemented by predictive accuracy and decision-curve analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 1036 patients enrolled in the PROMEtheus project, 238 (22.9%) were aged < 60 years. PCa was found in 67 subjects (28.1%); p2PSA, %p2PSA and PHI values were significantly higher (P < 0.001) among these subjects, while no differences were found in tPSA, fPSA and %fPSA values. On univariate analysis, %p2PSA (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.704) and PHI (AUC: 0.7) were the most accurate predictors, and these significantly outperformed tPSA (AUC: 0.549), fPSA (AUC: 0.511) and %fPSA (AUC: 0.557) in the prediction of PCa at biopsy (P ≤ 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression models, %p2PSA and PHI achieved independent predictor status and significantly increased the accuracy of multivariate models by 6.3 and 7.6%, respectively (P ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: PHI and %p2PSA are more accurate than the reference standard tests in predicting PCa in young men.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA; p2PSA; predictive models; prostate biopsy; prostate health index; young men

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24589357     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men.

Authors:  Hasan Dani; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Clinical Utility of Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Hao G Nguyen; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Whom to Biopsy: Prediagnostic Risk Stratification with Biomarkers, Nomograms, and Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Hasan Dani
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  An Automated Micro-Total Immunoassay System for Measuring Cancer-Associated α2,3-linked Sialyl N-Glycan-Carrying Prostate-Specific Antigen May Improve the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ishikawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa; Shingo Hatakeyama; Tatsuo Kurosawa; Kenji Nakamura; Shintaro Narita; Koji Mitsuzuka; Wilhelmina Duivenvoorden; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Takuya Koie; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Clinical Validation of a Serum Protein Panel (FLNA, FLNB and KRT19) for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shobha Ravipaty; Wenfang Wu; Aditee Dalvi; Nikunj Tanna; Joe Andreazi; Tracey Friss; Allison Klotz; Chenchen Liao; Jeonifer Garren; Sally Schofield; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Eric A Klein; Albert Dobi; Shiv Srivastava; Poornima Tekumalla; Michael A Kiebish; Vivek Vishnudas; Ranga Prasad Sarangarajan; Niven R Narain; Viatcheslav R Akmaev
Journal:  J Mol Biomark Diagn       Date:  2017-02-08

7.  Explication of the roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) as diagnostic and predictor tools for prostate cancer in equivocal PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Anmar M Nassir; Hala F M Kamel
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Assessment on clinical value of prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guangying Zhang; Yanyan Li; Chao Li; Na Li; Zhanzhan Li; Qin Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Early Prediction of Therapy Response to Abiraterone Acetate Using PSA Subforms in Patients with Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Katrin Schlack; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Manfred Fobker; Andres Jan Schrader; Axel Semjonow; Martin Boegemann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men.

Authors:  Wei-Gui Sun; Chao-Zhao Liang; Qi-Chuan Zheng; Xiao-Wu Hu; Zhi-Zhen Li; Ping Wu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.