Literature DB >> 24588880

The 2012 American College of Nurse-Midwives core competencies for basic midwifery practice: history and revision.

Julia C Phillippi, Melissa D Avery.   

Abstract

The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) Core Competencies for Basic Midwifery Practice, approved in 2012, (hereafter referred to as Core Competencies) outline the knowledge, skills, and abilities that can be expected of new certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and certified midwives (CMs). The Core Competencies are standards for midwifery education, and the document is an important guide for midwifery practice and policy. As a part of the 2012 revision, the Basic Competency Section of the ACNM Division of Education reviewed a variety of national and international documents to ensure that the basic education of CNMs/CMs is consistent with the practice of midwives in the United States and internationally. Few substantive changes were made to the document, but several areas were adjusted and clarified. New graduates continue to be prepared by midwifery education programs to provide safe, evidence-based midwifery care to women across the lifespan, well newborns up to 28 days, and sexual partners of women diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections.
© 2014 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College Of Nurse-Midwives; Core Competencies; antepartum; clinical competence; competency-based education; gynecology; intrapartum; midwifery; midwifery education; midwifery standards; nurse-midwives; postpartum; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24588880     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  8 in total

1.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  On the same page: a novel interprofessional model of patient-centered perinatal consultation visits.

Authors:  J C Phillippi; S L Holley; M N Schorn; J Lauderdale; C L Roumie; K Bennett
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Marian MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Renee Cramer; Melissa Cheyney; Timothy Fisher; Emma Butt; Y Tony Yang; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years.

Authors:  Karine Welffens; Sara Derisbourg; Elena Costa; Yvon Englert; Axelle Pintiaux; Michèle Warnimont; Christine Kirkpatrick; Pierre Buekens; Caroline Daelemans
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Five Steps to Integrating Telehealth Into APRN Curricula.

Authors:  Joanna Guenther; Steven Branham; Susan Calloway; Wanda Hilliard; Rosalinda Jimenez; Emily Merrill
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 0.767

Review 6.  Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care.

Authors:  Daphne N McRae; Nazeem Muhajarine; Kathrin Stoll; Maureen Mayhew; Saraswathi Vedam; Deborah Mpofu; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-03-18

7.  Interprofessional Education Between Midwifery Students and Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: An American College of Nurse-Midwives and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Collaboration.

Authors:  Melissa D Avery; John C Jennings; Elaine Germano; Tia Andrighetti; Amy M Autry; Kim Q Dau; Susan Agard Krause; Owen C Montgomery; Tonya B Nicholson; Audrey Perry; Phillip N Rauk; Heather Z Sankey; Mark B Woodland
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Can birth outcome inequality be reduced using targeted caseload midwifery in a deprived diverse inner city population? A retrospective cohort study, London, UK.

Authors:  Ruth Hadebe; Paul T Seed; Diana Essien; Kyle Headen; Saheel Mahmud; Salwa Owasil; Cristina Fernandez Turienzo; Carla Stanke; Jane Sandall; Mara Bruno; Nina Khazaezadeh; Eugene Oteng-Ntim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.