BACKGROUND: In response to the dramatic increase in alcohol-related problems in Lithuania, policy measures, including alcohol advertising and availability restrictions combined with taxation increase, were implemented in 2007-08. Simultaneously, a full alcohol advertising ban was adopted to take effect from 1 January 2012. Therefore, the alcohol industry responded with extensive lobbying aiming to revoke this ban, and ultimately they succeeded at the end of December 2011. AIM: To document and analyse actions of stakeholders and events during the alcohol advertising ban cancellation process in Lithuania. METHODS: Policy analysis includes a development of event time-line, description of key stakeholders' actions and a review of policy context. FINDINGS: The alcohol industry in Lithuania used similar tactics as the tobacco industry globally, such as creating strong and diverse opposing groups. The industry successfully exerted pressure to change alcohol control legislation, while non-governmental organizations had the important role of a watchdog, blunting industry's efforts. Unequal power distribution made it difficult to withstand combined local and international lobbying to cancel the ban. CONCLUSION: Given the global nature of the alcohol industry, there is a need for international regulation to limit the influence of vested interests on national lawmaking.
BACKGROUND: In response to the dramatic increase in alcohol-related problems in Lithuania, policy measures, including alcohol advertising and availability restrictions combined with taxation increase, were implemented in 2007-08. Simultaneously, a full alcohol advertising ban was adopted to take effect from 1 January 2012. Therefore, the alcohol industry responded with extensive lobbying aiming to revoke this ban, and ultimately they succeeded at the end of December 2011. AIM: To document and analyse actions of stakeholders and events during the alcohol advertising ban cancellation process in Lithuania. METHODS: Policy analysis includes a development of event time-line, description of key stakeholders' actions and a review of policy context. FINDINGS: The alcohol industry in Lithuania used similar tactics as the tobacco industry globally, such as creating strong and diverse opposing groups. The industry successfully exerted pressure to change alcohol control legislation, while non-governmental organizations had the important role of a watchdog, blunting industry's efforts. Unequal power distribution made it difficult to withstand combined local and international lobbying to cancel the ban. CONCLUSION: Given the global nature of the alcohol industry, there is a need for international regulation to limit the influence of vested interests on national lawmaking.
Authors: Shiwei Liu; Fulin Huang; Xiaolei Zhu; Suhua Zhou; Xiang Si; Yan Zhao; Yang Liu; Xiaochang Zhang; Sally Casswell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Pavel Grigoriev; Domantas Jasilionis; Daumantas Stumbrys; Vladislava Stankūnienė; Vladimir M Shkolnikov Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura Miščikienė; Nijolė Goštautaitė Midttun; Lukas Galkus; Gražina Belian; Janina Petkevičienė; Justina Vaitkevičiūtė; Mindaugas Štelemėkas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lukas Galkus; Shannon Lange; Vaida Liutkutė-Gumarov; Laura Miščikienė; Janina Petkevičienė; Jürgen Rehm; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Alexander Tran; Justina Vaitkevičiūtė Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jürgen Rehm; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Carina Ferreira-Borges; Huan Jiang; Shannon Lange; Maria Neufeld; Robin Room; Sally Casswell; Alexander Tran; Jakob Manthey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.390