Margaret Broadwater1, Linda P Spear. 1. Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An acute ethanol (EtOH) challenge prior to fear conditioning typically disrupts fear retention to contextual cues to a greater degree than fear retention to a discrete tone cue, and adolescent rats are less sensitive than adults to these EtOH-induced disruptions of context fear memory. Given that some research suggests that repeated EtOH exposure during adolescence may "lock-in" adolescent-typical EtOH sensitivity into adulthood, the purpose of this study was to determine whether adults exposed to EtOH as adolescents would be less sensitive to EtOH-induced disruptions of context fear. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were given 4 g/kg intragastric EtOH (25% v/v) or water every 48 hours for a total of 11 exposures during adolescence (postnatal day [P] 28 to 48) or adulthood (P70-90). After a 22-day non-EtOH period, animals were acutely challenged with 1 g/kg intraperitoneal EtOH or saline 10 minutes prior to tone or context (noncued) fear conditioning. Tone and context fear retention was subsequently examined. RESULTS: Regardless of age or exposure history, typical deficits in context fear retention were evident after EtOH challenge during conditioning. Similarly, tone fear retention was disrupted in all animals that were trained in the presence of EtOH, which was somewhat surprising given the relative resistance of tone fear retention to an acute EtOH challenge. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the notion of a "lock-in" of adolescent-typical EtOH sensitivity as there was no influence of exposure age on sensitivity to the disruptive effects of an acute EtOH challenge. Thus, it appears that not all adolescent-like EtOH sensitivities persist into adulthood after prior EtOH exposure during adolescence.
BACKGROUND: An acute ethanol (EtOH) challenge prior to fear conditioning typically disrupts fear retention to contextual cues to a greater degree than fear retention to a discrete tone cue, and adolescent rats are less sensitive than adults to these EtOH-induced disruptions of context fear memory. Given that some research suggests that repeated EtOH exposure during adolescence may "lock-in" adolescent-typical EtOH sensitivity into adulthood, the purpose of this study was to determine whether adults exposed to EtOH as adolescents would be less sensitive to EtOH-induced disruptions of context fear. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were given 4 g/kg intragastric EtOH (25% v/v) or water every 48 hours for a total of 11 exposures during adolescence (postnatal day [P] 28 to 48) or adulthood (P70-90). After a 22-day non-EtOH period, animals were acutely challenged with 1 g/kg intraperitoneal EtOH or saline 10 minutes prior to tone or context (noncued) fear conditioning. Tone and context fear retention was subsequently examined. RESULTS: Regardless of age or exposure history, typical deficits in context fear retention were evident after EtOH challenge during conditioning. Similarly, tone fear retention was disrupted in all animals that were trained in the presence of EtOH, which was somewhat surprising given the relative resistance of tone fear retention to an acute EtOH challenge. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the notion of a "lock-in" of adolescent-typical EtOH sensitivity as there was no influence of exposure age on sensitivity to the disruptive effects of an acute EtOH challenge. Thus, it appears that not all adolescent-like EtOH sensitivities persist into adulthood after prior EtOH exposure during adolescence.
Authors: Aaron M White; Jon G Bae; Melanie C Truesdale; Sukaina Ahmad; Wilkie A Wilson; H Scott Swartzwelder Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Andrew S Vore; Thaddeus M Barney; Molly M Deak; Elena I Varlinskaya; Terrence Deak Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 19.227
Authors: Jessica Ruffolo; Jude A Frie; Hayley H A Thorpe; Malik Asfandyaar Talhat; Jibran Y Khokhar Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Chantelle Ferland-Beckham; Lauren E Chaby; Nikolaos P Daskalakis; Dayan Knox; Israel Liberzon; Miranda M Lim; Christa McIntyre; Shane A Perrine; Victoria B Risbrough; Esther L Sabban; Andreas Jeromin; Magali Haas Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Paige Marsland; Allissa Parrella; Andrew S Vore; Thaddeus M Barney; Elena I Varlinskaya; Terrence Deak Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.697