Literature DB >> 24587600

Comparison of Efficacy of Three Suture Materials, i.e., Poliglecaprone 25, Polyglactin 910, Polyamide, as Subcuticular Skin Stitches in Post-Cesarean Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Urvashi Vats1, Narayan Pandit Suchitra2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of three suture materials, i.e., poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, and polyamide, as subcuticular skin stitches in post-cesarean women. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a randomized clinical trial. POPULATION: The study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a tertiary institute, LTMMC, Sion, Mumbai, India. Only those women undergoing emergency cesarean section were included.
METHODS: The study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a tertiary institute, LTMMC, Sion, Mumbai, India. 90 women undergoing emergency cesarean section were included and divided into three groups. In group 1, poliglecaprone 25 was used as subcuticular skin stitches; in group 2, polyglactin 910 was used as subcuticular skin stitches; and in group 3, polyamide was used as subcuticular skin stitches.
RESULTS: Thirty percentage of the patients in group 3 had discomfort on day 10, while it was only 3.3 % in group 1. In group 1, 6.6 % patients had swelling and indurations, while it was 33.3 % in group 2 on day 4. Wound dehiscence was present in 3.3 % patients in group 1, 26.6 % in group 2, and 6.6 % in group 3. Regarding wound healing, 93.3 % patients had excellent wound healing in group 1, 66.6 % in group 2, and 86.6 % in group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: The results were almost similar with poliglecaprone and polyamide, except for discomfort which was present more in patients in group 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poliglecaprone; Polyamide; Polyglactin

Year:  2013        PMID: 24587600      PMCID: PMC3931899          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0448-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

1.  Emergency department repair of hand lacerations using absorbable vicryl sutures.

Authors:  P C Shetty; S Dicksheet; T M Scalea
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair.

Authors:  B Guyuron; C Vaughan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Use of fast absorption material for skin closure in young children.

Authors:  J P Canarelli; J Ricard; L M Collet; E Marasse
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep

4.  A review of absorbable suture materials in head & neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture.

Authors:  J LaBagnara
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.697

5.  Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations.

Authors:  J V Quinn; A E Drzewiecki; I G Stiell; T J Elmslie
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.

Authors:  T Gys; A Hubens
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.090

7.  Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing.

Authors:  P J Osther; P Gjøde; B B Mortensen; P B Mortensen; J Bartholin; F Gottrup
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.

Authors:  G Joseph Parell; Gary D Becker
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

9.  Wound registry: development and validation.

Authors:  J E Hollander; A J Singer; S Valentine; M C Henry
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.721

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison Between Using Monocryl Suture and Polypropylene Suture in Closure of Alar Base Excision in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Saud A Aldhabaan; Jibril Y Hudise; Badi F Aldosari
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.

Authors:  Amanda J Poprzeczny; Rosalie M Grivell; Jennie Louise; Andrea R Deussen; Jodie M Dodd
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Comparison of the effect of skin closure materials on skin closure during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Ye Huang; Xinbo Yin; Junni Wei; Suhong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.

Authors:  Joshua D Dahlke; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Lindsay Maggio; Jeffrey D Sperling; Suneet P Chauhan; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 7.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.