| Literature DB >> 24586710 |
Xiao-Ying Wang1, Wen-Yan Kang1, Qiong Yang1, Lin-Yuan Zhang1, Sheng-Di Chen1, Jun Liu1.
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a complicated gait disturbance in Parkinson's disease (PD) and a relevant subclinical predictor algorithm is lacking. The main purpose of this study is to explore the potential value of surface electromyograph (sEMG) and plasma α-synuclein levels as predictors of the FOG seen in PD. 21 PD patients and 15 normal controls were recruited. Motor function was evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG-Q). Simultaneously, gait analysis was also performed using VICON capture system in PD patients and sEMG data was recorded as well. Total plasma α-synuclein was quantitatively assessed by Luminex assay in all participants. Recruited PD patients were classified into two groups: PD patients with FOG (PD+FOG) and without FOG (PD-FOG), based on clinical manifestation, the results of the FOG-Q and VICON capture system. PD+FOG patients displayed higher FOG-Q scores, decreased walking speed, smaller step length, smaller stride length and prolonged double support time compared to the PD-FOG in the gait trial. sEMG data indicated that gastrocnemius activity in PD+FOG patients was significantly reduced compared to PD-FOG patients. In addition, plasma α-synuclein levels were significantly decreased in the PD+FOG group compared to control group; however, no significant difference was found between the PD+FOG and PD-FOG groups. Our study revealed that gastrocnemius sEMG could be used to evaluate freezing gait in PD patients, while plasma α-synuclein might discriminate freezing of gait in PD patients from normal control, though no difference was found between the PD+FOG and PD-FOG groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24586710 PMCID: PMC3937335 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic information of different groups.
| PD+FOG (n = 13) | PD-FOG (n = 8) | Control (n = 15) | |
|
| 8/5 | 6/2 | 9/6 |
|
| |||
| Range | 55–77 | 61–75 | 58–74 |
| Mean | 66.92±6.69 | 67.75±4.17 | 64.73±4.88 |
|
| |||
| Range | 1–4 | 1–3 | - |
| Mean | 2.46±0.78 | 2.25±0.76 | - |
|
| |||
| Range | 2–15 | 2–6 | - |
| Mean | 6.77±3.77 | 4.13±1.55 | - |
|
| |||
| Range | 5–76 | 18–45 | - |
| Mean | 31.54±20.70 | 33.63±10.47 | - |
|
| |||
| Range | 7–22 | 0–2 | - |
| Mean | 14.46±4.41 | 1.00±0.93 | - |
T-T test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for comparison between different groups. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic information among the three groups.
Abbreviation: PD+FOG = PD patients with freezing of gait; PD-FOG = PD patients without freezing of gait; H-Y scale = Hohen Yahr scale; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; FOG-Q = Freezing of gait questionnaire.
Gait cycle parameters of PD+FOG group and PD-FOG group.
| PD+FOG | PD-FOG |
| |
| Walking speed (m/s) | 0.78±0.17 | 0.95±0.07 | 0.006 |
| Cadence (step/min) | 97.75±15.24 | 102.82±12.36 | 0.438 |
| Stride length (m) | 0.991±0.11 | 1.10±0.45 | 0.004 |
| Stride time (s) | 1.28±0.22 | 1.18±0.14 | 0.274 |
| Step length (m) | 0.50±0.06 | 0.58±0.02 | 0.001 |
| Step time (s) | 0.64±0.12 | 0.61±0.10 | 0.568 |
| Step width (m) | 0.15±0.03 | 0.13±0.04 | 0.305 |
| Double Support (%) | 25.19±3.12 | 22.09±7.84 | 0.022 |
T-T test and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized for comparing the gait cycle parameters between two disease groups. Compared to PD-FOG group, PD+FOG group displayed a decreased walking speed (p = 0.006), smaller stride length (p = 0.004), smaller step length (p = 0.001) and prolonged double support time (p = 0.022).
Abbreviation: PD+FOG = PD patients with freezing of gait; PD-FOG = PD patients without freezing of gait.
Figure 1Surface EMG data of PD+FOG and PD-FOG group.
(A) Mean amplitude of GAS activity was significantly reduced in the PD+FOG group compared to the PD-FOG group, but was similar for TIA activity. (B) Mean area of GAS activity was significantly reduced in the PD+FOG group compared to the PD-FOG group, but was similar for TIA activity.
Figure 2Plasma α-synuclein level of different groups.
After controlling for blood contamination, plasma α-synuclein levels were decreased in the PD+FOG, PD-FOG and control groups successively. The difference between PD+FOG and control group achieved significance but there was no statistical difference between the PD-FOG and control groups.