BACKGROUND: Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and tuberculin skin test (TST) has not been compared in a US college population with varying risk of tuberculosis exposure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of students tested for tuberculosis at the University of Pennsylvania Student Health Service between 2009 and 2011. We stratified students into high-, low-, and no-risk categories for exposure to tuberculosis and compared QFT-GIT and TST performance in risk groups adjusting demographic characteristics. RESULTS: During the study period, 15 936 tuberculosis tests were performed in 9483 college students. Coming from a tuberculosis-endemic country was the only risk factor significantly associated with having a positive result (odds ratio [OR] 12.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2-16.5). Test specificity was higher for TST than QFT-GIT (99.7% vs 91.4%; P < .0001). Application of a higher threshold for positivity improved comparability of QFT-GIT with TST in the low-risk group (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.2; 95% CI, .4-3.3) but not in the high-risk group (AOR .4; 95% CI, .3-.5). CONCLUSIONS: QFT-GIT was less specific than TST. Our findings support the use of TST for US college students who need tuberculosis testing and the use of risk-stratified interpretation for students who are tested with QFT-GIT.
BACKGROUND: Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and tuberculin skin test (TST) has not been compared in a US college population with varying risk of tuberculosis exposure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of students tested for tuberculosis at the University of Pennsylvania Student Health Service between 2009 and 2011. We stratified students into high-, low-, and no-risk categories for exposure to tuberculosis and compared QFT-GIT and TST performance in risk groups adjusting demographic characteristics. RESULTS: During the study period, 15 936 tuberculosis tests were performed in 9483 college students. Coming from a tuberculosis-endemic country was the only risk factor significantly associated with having a positive result (odds ratio [OR] 12.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2-16.5). Test specificity was higher for TST than QFT-GIT (99.7% vs 91.4%; P < .0001). Application of a higher threshold for positivity improved comparability of QFT-GIT with TST in the low-risk group (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.2; 95% CI, .4-3.3) but not in the high-risk group (AOR .4; 95% CI, .3-.5). CONCLUSIONS: QFT-GIT was less specific than TST. Our findings support the use of TST for US college students who need tuberculosis testing and the use of risk-stratified interpretation for students who are tested with QFT-GIT.
Entities:
Keywords:
diagnostic techniques and procedures; interferon-gamma release tests; latent tuberculosis; sensitivity and specificity
Authors: E Chiappini; A Lo Vecchio; S Garazzino; G L Marseglia; F Bernardi; E Castagnola; P Tomà; D Cirillo; C Russo; C Gabiano; D Ciofi; G Losurdo; M Bocchino; E Tortoli; M Tadolini; A Villani; A Guarino; S Esposito Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Saloua Tagmouti; Madeline Slater; Andrea Benedetti; Sandra V Kik; Niaz Banaei; Adithya Cattamanchi; John Metcalfe; David Dowdy; Richard van Zyl Smit; Nandini Dendukuri; Madhukar Pai; Claudia Denkinger Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-10
Authors: Caixia Bi; Richard B Clark; Ronald Master; Hema Kapoor; Martin H Kroll; Ann E Salm; William A Meyer Journal: Microbiol Spectr Date: 2021-07-28