Literature DB >> 24585551

Rhythm course over 5 years following surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Niv Ad1, Sari D Holmes2, Lori E Stone2, Graciela Pritchard2, Linda Henry2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reporting methods for surgical ablation (SA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) were standardized by the Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines, stating that results should be reported only for the first 2 years following SA. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of SA over 5 years and determine predictors for success over that period.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for all SA (n=787). Rhythm was verified by electrocardiogram and Holter monitoring at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months and yearly thereafter. Patients with rhythm status available at 2 and 5 years were included in the main analyses (n=137). Multivariate logistic regression was used for predictors of normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Receiver operating curves compared 2- and 5-year predicted probability against observed rhythm status by year.
RESULTS: Return to NSR at 2 years was 88% (80% off antiarrhythmic drugs) and at 5 years was 85% (71% off antiarrhythmic drugs). The majority of patients (64%) had stable NSR over 5 years. The only predictor for 2-year NSR was smaller left atrial size (odds ratio [OR]=0.40, P=0.044). Predictors for 5-year NSR were smaller left atrial size (OR=0.28, P=0.002), age (OR=0.91, P=0.031) and length of hospital stay (OR=0.85, P=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated stable results of SA for AF over time with somewhat different predictors for 2- and 5-year NSR in a group of patients with complete follow-up at both time points. Accurate models to determine predictors for success of SA more than 2 years after surgery are essential to better understand long-term outcome for patients with AF.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Long-term follow-up; Rhythm; Surgical ablation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24585551     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  7 in total

1.  Maze permutations during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Anson M Lee
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Surgical ablation is effective: But surgeons need to do better.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Matthew C Henn; Timothy S Lancaster; Jacob R Miller; Laurie A Sinn; Richard B Schuessler; Marc R Moon; Spencer J Melby; Hersh S Maniar; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  The Cox-maze IV procedure in its second decade: still the gold standard?

Authors:  Chawannuch Ruaengsri; Matthew R Schill; Ali J Khiabani; Richard B Schuessler; Spencer J Melby; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Early Stable Sinus Rhythm Associated With Greater Success 5 Years After Surgical Ablation.

Authors:  Niv Ad; Sari D Holmes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  A Chronicle of Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy: From Cox Maze to Convergent.

Authors:  Riyaz A Kaba; Omar Ahmed; Elijah Behr; Aziz Momin
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2022-04

7.  The long-term efficacy of concomitant maze IV surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Camilla Skals Engelsgaard; Kenneth Bruun Pedersen; Lars Peter Riber; Peter Appel Pallesen; Axel Brandes
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2018-04-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.