Literature DB >> 24585494

Abnormal non-invasive prenatal test results concordant with karyotype of cytotrophoblast but not reflecting abnormal fetal karyotype.

M I Srebniak1, K E M Diderich, P Noomen, A Dijkman, F A T de Vries, D van Opstal.   

Abstract

We present a unique case in which non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnoses showed abnormal, but discordant, results. A patient with abnormal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results, indicating a 99% risk for monosomy X, was referred to our center for genetic counseling and confirmatory studies. Cytogenetic analysis of uncultured mesenchymal core of chorionic villi (CV) revealed a mosaic male karyotype consisting of two abnormal cell lines: one with monosomy X and the other with an isodicentric chromosome Y. Array analysis of the trophoblast confirmed the NIPT results. Based on the CV results, the patient opted for termination of pregnancy. After extensive counseling by a clinical geneticist about the possible outcomes and by a gynecologist about the risk of a second-trimester abortion procedure, the patient agreed to undergo early amniocentesis. Amniocentesis confirmed that the fetus had a male karyotype with an isodicentric chromosome Y, and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array profile suggested absence of the monosomy X cell line. The male infant was expected to be infertile. The patient finally decided to continue the pregnancy. Our case confirms that NIPT results are comparable with those of short-term cultured CV investigating the cytotrophoblast. Our patient was not aware that the NIPT results reveal the placental karyotype, which sometimes may be different from the fetal karyotype. Pretest counseling and providing the risk figures for false-positive and false-negative NIPT results are of great importance in order to discourage women from terminating pregnancies based on NIPT results alone.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNP array; cytotrophoblast; non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24585494     DOI: 10.1002/uog.13334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal testing using a novel analysis pipeline to screen for all autosomal fetal aneuploidies improves pregnancy management.

Authors:  Baran Bayindir; Luc Dehaspe; Nathalie Brison; Paul Brady; Simon Ardui; Molka Kammoun; Lars Van der Veken; Klaske Lichtenbelt; Kris Van den Bogaert; Jeroen Van Houdt; Hilde Peeters; Hilde Van Esch; Thomy de Ravel; Eric Legius; Koen Devriendt; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Assessment and Clinical Utility of a Non-Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Technology.

Authors:  Uzay Gormus; Alka Chaubey; Suresh Shenoy; Yong Wee Wong; Lee Yin Chan; Bao Ping Choo; Liza Oraha; Anna Gousseva; Fredrik Persson; Lawrence Prensky; Ephrem Chin; Madhuri Hegde
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Mollie A Minear; Elisa Berson; Shilpa Sridhar; Margaret Rote; Anthony Hung; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-16

4.  Positive predictive value of non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal chromosome disorders using cell-free DNA in maternal serum: independent clinical experience of a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Whitney A Neufeld-Kaiser; Edith Y Cheng; Yajuan J Liu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation originates from the cytotrophoblast: proof from an unique case.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Peter G J Nikkels; Martin G Elferink; Martijn A Oudijk; Carla van Oppen; Patrick van Zon; Jeske van Harssel; Heleen Schuring-Blom; Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Origin and clinical relevance of chromosomal aberrations other than the common trisomies detected by genome-wide NIPS: results of the TRIDENT study.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Merel C van Maarle; Klaske Lichtenbelt; Marjan M Weiss; Heleen Schuring-Blom; Shama L Bhola; Mariette J V Hoffer; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Merryn V Macville; Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Lutgarde Govaerts; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; Nicolette den Hollander; Ilse Feenstra; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Dick Oepkes; Stijn Ghesquiere; Rutger W W Brouwer; Lean Beulen; Sander Bollen; Martin G Elferink; Roy Straver; Lidewij Henneman; Godelieve C Page-Christiaens; Erik A Sistermans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Placental studies elucidate discrepancies between NIPT showing a structural chromosome aberration and a differently abnormal fetal karyotype.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Stefanie van Veen; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Joke Polak; Nicole van Koetsveld; Marjan Boter; Attie T J I Go; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Krista Prinsen; Lies H Hoefsloot; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Luigi Carbone; Federica Cariati; Laura Sarno; Alessandro Conforti; Francesca Bagnulo; Ida Strina; Lucio Pastore; Giuseppe Maria Maruotti; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  False Negative NIPT Results: Risk Figures for Chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 Based on Chorionic Villi Results in 5967 Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Joke Polak; Femke de Vries; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Attie T J I Go; Maarten F C M Knapen; Cardi van den Berg; Karin E M Diderich; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.