Literature DB >> 24584619

Intraperitoneal fluid overestimates hydration status assessment by bioimpedance spectroscopy.

David Arroyo1, Nayara Panizo1, Soraya Abad1, Almudena Vega1, Abraham Rincón1, Ana Pérez de José1, Juan M López-Gómez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a valuable tool to assess nutrition and volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, data about the influence of intraperitoneal fluid on body composition measures are conflicting, and there is no clear consensus about whether the abdomen should be drained before the procedure. We designed a comparison study to detect the influence of intra-abdominal fluid on BIS results.
METHODS: We performed 73 pairs of BIS measurements in 34 stable PD patients, first with the peritoneum filled with a 1.36% glucose dialysate solution and then after the solution was drained. Patients stayed in the supine position for 10 minutes before the BIS procedure, and the electrodes were not moved between measures. Clinical and demographic data were collected, as were analytic parameters of nutrition and volume status.
RESULTS: Fluid overload is overestimated when BIS is performed with a full abdomen (1.82 ± 1.73 L vs 1.64 ± 1.68 L, p = 0.043). We also found a spurious overestimation in extracellular water (16.40 ± 3.21 L vs 16.24 ± 3.16 L, p < 0.001) and in relative overhydration (8.29% ± 6.96% vs 7.14% ± 6.79%, p = 0.017). No differences in intracellular water or parameters of nutrition were found. We observed negative correlations for the extracellular water overestimation with age (r = -0.245, p = 0.037), serum B-type natriuretic peptide (r = -0.366, p = 0.036), body mass index (r = -0.248, p = 0.035), and lean tissue index (r = -0.427, p = 0.001). The difference in extracellular water correlated only with body mass index (r = -0.259, p = 0.039). We also found that, assessed at 50 KHz, whole-body impedance (-4.52 ± 8.37, p = 0.001) and phase angle (-0.08 ± 0.23 degrees, p = 0.002) were both lower when BIS was performed in patients with a full abdomen.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluid overload is overestimated by BIS when performed in patients with dialysate in the peritoneum. The observed differences are greater in younger, more poorly nourished, or less overhydrated patients. If more precise results are required, we suggest that the abdomen be drained before BIS is performed.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioimpedance spectroscopy; body composition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24584619      PMCID: PMC4335932          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  22 in total

Review 1.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Ursula G Kyle; Ingvar Bosaeus; Antonio D De Lorenzo; Paul Deurenberg; Marinos Elia; José Manuel Gómez; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Luisa Kent-Smith; Jean-Claude Melchior; Matthias Pirlich; Hermann Scharfetter; Annemie M W J Schols; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Association between serum n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration and left ventricular dysfunction and extracellular water in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jung-Ahn Lee; Do-Hyoung Kim; Soo-Jeong Yoo; Dong-Jin Oh; Suk-Hee Yu; Eung-Tack Kang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Volume overhydration is related to endothelial dysfunction in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Li-Tao Cheng; Yan-Li Gao; Chao Qin; Jun-Ping Tian; Yue Gu; Shu-Hong Bi; Wen Tang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance fails to quantify sequestration of abdominal fluid.

Authors:  K Cha; A G Hill; J D Rounds; D W Wilmore
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-02

5.  Comparing different methods of assessing body composition in end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  B A Cooper; A Aslani; M Ryan; F Y Zhu; L S Ibels; B J Allen; C A Pollock
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Enrollment fluid status is independently associated with long-term survival of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Paul Fein; Jyotiprakas Chattopadhyay; Mal Marut Paluch; Cezary Borawski; Betty Matza; Morrell M Avram
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2008

7.  Application of body composition monitoring to peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Carlo Crepaldi; Sachin Soni; Chang Yin Chionh; Peter Wabel; Dinna N Cruz; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.580

8.  Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study.

Authors:  Edwina A Brown; Simon J Davies; Peter Rutherford; Frederique Meeus; Mercedes Borras; Werner Riegel; Jose C Divino Filho; Edward Vonesh; Monique van Bree
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Comparison of volume overload with cycler-assisted versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Sara N Davison; Gian S Jhangri; Kailash Jindal; Neesh Pannu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Volker Wizemann; Peter Wabel; Paul Chamney; Wojciech Zaluska; Ulrich Moissl; Christiane Rode; Teresa Malecka-Masalska; Daniele Marcelli
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fluid in the Peritoneal Cavity When Measuring Bioimpedance.

Authors:  J I Minguela; B Aurrekoetxea; I Jimeno; R Ruiz de Gauna
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  A comparison of fluid status determination using bioelectric impedance and the isotope dilution method in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yanna Dou; Yanan Gong; Afang Li; Peipei Wang; Dongyan Song; Yuyang Wang; Dong Liu; Genyang Cheng; Zhanzheng Zhao
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Associations with Body Composition, Peritoneal Transport, and Peritoneal Glucose Absorption.

Authors:  Ana Paula Bernardo; Jose C Oliveira; Olivia Santos; Maria J Carvalho; Antonio Cabrita; Anabela Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Bioimpedance spectroscopy for fluid status assessment in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis: Implications for peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schwaiger; Amrei Simon; Peter Wabel; Benjamin Schairer; Carolin Berner; Lorenzo Signorini; Matthäus Ernstbrunner; Rayko Evstatiev; Philipp Schwabl; Georg Hinterholzer; Florian Frommlet; Andreas Vychytil; Christian J Müller; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Pedal edema and jugular venous pressure for volume overload in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Michael A Garfinkle; James Barton
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-01-13

6.  Dialysis vintage stratified comparison of body composition, hydration and nutritional state in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Krzysztof Hoppe; Krzysztof Schwermer; Anna Kawka; Patrycja Klysz; Ewa Baum; Malgorzata Kaluzna; Dorota Sikorska; Anna Scigacz; Bengt Lindholm; Krzysztof Pawlaczyk; Andrzej Oko
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.