Literature DB >> 24583874

mTORC2 dictates Warburg effect and drug resistance.

Kenta Masui1, Webster K Cavenee2, Paul S Mischel3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  FoxO; acetylation; c-Myc; drug resistance; glioblastoma; mTORC2; metabolic reprogramming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583874      PMCID: PMC4013152          DOI: 10.4161/cc.28377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
Metabolic reprogramming, a prominent phenotype in cancer cells, is the adaptation to shifts in the usage of metabolites, including glucose, fatty acids, amino acids, and glutamine. The central feature of this adaptation lies in the fact that cancer cells undergo glycolysis even in the presence of ample oxygen, contrary to normal cells. This aerobic glycolysis, termed “the Warburg effect,” has been considered to give tumor cells selective advantages through enhanced catabolism of glucose and glutamine, providing the raw materials for the synthesis of nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids to satiate rapidly dividing cancer cells. On the other side of the coin, however, unravelling the molecular network that dictates the Warburg effect may be potentially exploited for identifying new drug targets and drug resistance mechanisms in cancer. Among the molecular players implicated in governing the Warburg effect, one of the central components for cellular metabolic integration is the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). mTOR kinase exists in 2 multi-protein complexes and is a critical effector downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K), which plays a central role in integrating growth factor receptor signaling with cellular metabolism. mTORC1 is a well-established cancer target, linking PI3K signaling through Akt to protein translation, glycolysis, and lipogenesis. In contrast, the upstream role of mTORC2, which phosphorylates Akt on serine 473, thereby maximizing its activity, is less well understood than that of mTORC1 in cancer. While some Akt-independent effects of mTORC2 in carcinogenesis have been elucidated, the impact of mTORC2 in cancer metabolism remains unclear. Therefore, we recently set out to determine the role of mTORC2 in metabolic reprogramming of glioblastoma (GBM), the most common form of adult primary brain cancer and one of the most lethal of all human malignancies. Surprisingly, an unexpected Akt-independent role for mTORC2 in inducing metabolic reprogramming in GBM was found. mTORC2 renders GBM cells strongly addicted to glucose, and this is mediated by regulating the intracellular level of c-Myc, a crucial regulator of the Warburg effect. mTORC2 is shown to execute an Akt-independent phosphorylation of class IIa histone deacetylases, which leads to the inactivating acetylation of FoxO, a negative regulator of c-Myc. As a result, the microRNA-dependent blockade of c-Myc is relieved, potently promoting glycolytic tumor growth. Importantly, mTORC2/acetylated FoxO/c-Myc expression confers an adverse prognostic impact to GBM patients, and it can be abrogated by dual PI3K/mTOR kinase inhibition, resulting in tumor cell death of the mouse xenograft tumor models with patient-derived GBM neurosphere cells. These results provide new insight into the role of mTORC2 signaling in cancer, identifying metabolic reprogramming through a c-Myc-dependent pathway as a critical consequence. These results have an intriguing implication; that is to say, GBM is addicted to c-Myc. c-Myc plays a central role in cancer cell metabolism, but the mechanisms by which activated growth factor receptor signaling pathways harness c-Myc remain to be clarified. Our recent studies demonstrate that GBM with an activated mutant form of EGFR engages c-Myc signaling at least by 2 complementary steps: (1) promotion of alternative splicing of Delta Max to modulate c-Myc function and (2) upregulation of cellular levels of c-Myc through mTORC2. This new, multistep scheme highlights the heavy reliance of GBM on c-Myc activity to promote glycolytic metabolism, which might be exploitable as a potential therapeutic opportunity. Another therapeutic spin-off derives from the findings that, as a consequence of dual regulation of FoxO through Akt-dependent phosphorylation and mTORC2-dependent acetylation, GBM can evade PI3K/Akt inhibition via mTORC2-dependent FoxO acetylation and sustained c-Myc expression. FoxO and its downstream regulation of c-Myc are tightly controlled through 2 independent and highly specific pathways of post-translational modification and microRNA suppression. The net consequence of this series of events is the conferral of resistance to PI3K and Akt inhibitors in GBM. Patients with GBM have a median survival time of 12–15 months from the time of initial diagnosis, despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and new approaches are desperately needed. A new era of targeted cancer therapies has been heralded by progress in genomics and epigenomics, and discovery of the distinct molecular characteristics of cancer cells has led to the development of therapies that selectively zero in on these cancer-specific targets. However, drug resistance occurs even to this category of therapeutics, regardless of drug target and mechanism of action. Our study further sheds new light on the resistance mechanisms of GBM to targeted therapies, providing compelling rationale for the combined inhibition of PI3K/Akt and mTORC2 as a promising “combinatorial targeted therapy” for this deadly brain cancer (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. mTORC2 is a kingpin of the Warburg effect and drug resistance. mTORC2 inhibits FoxO via acetylation, whereas PI3K/Akt via phosphorylation, leading to the upregulation of c-Myc, a key effector of the Warburg effect. PI3K/Akt-targeted therapies alone can be bypassed by mTORC2-mediated pathways, whereas targeting both PI3K/Akt and mTORC2 potently suppresses c-Myc and the Warburg effect.

Figure 1. mTORC2 is a kingpin of the Warburg effect and drug resistance. mTORC2 inhibits FoxO via acetylation, whereas PI3K/Akt via phosphorylation, leading to the upregulation of c-Myc, a key effector of the Warburg effect. PI3K/Akt-targeted therapies alone can be bypassed by mTORC2-mediated pathways, whereas targeting both PI3K/Akt and mTORC2 potently suppresses c-Myc and the Warburg effect.
  8 in total

1.  Oncogenic EGFR signaling activates an mTORC2-NF-κB pathway that promotes chemotherapy resistance.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Tanaka; Ivan Babic; David Nathanson; David Akhavan; Deliang Guo; Beatrice Gini; Julie Dang; Shaojun Zhu; Huijun Yang; Jason De Jesus; Ali Nael Amzajerdi; Yinan Zhang; Christian C Dibble; Hancai Dan; Amanda Rinkenbaugh; William H Yong; Harry V Vinters; Joseph F Gera; Webster K Cavenee; Timothy F Cloughesy; Brendan D Manning; Albert S Baldwin; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  mTOR signaling in growth control and disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Laplante; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  A tale of two approaches: complementary mechanisms of cytotoxic and targeted therapy resistance may inform next-generation cancer treatments.

Authors:  Kenta Masui; Beatrice Gini; Jill Wykosky; Ciro Zanca; Paul S Mischel; Frank B Furnari; Webster K Cavenee
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  EGFR mutation-induced alternative splicing of Max contributes to growth of glycolytic tumors in brain cancer.

Authors:  Ivan Babic; Erik S Anderson; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Deliang Guo; Kenta Masui; Bing Li; Shaojun Zhu; Yuchao Gu; Genaro R Villa; David Akhavan; David Nathanson; Beatrice Gini; Sergey Mareninov; Rui Li; Carolina Espindola Camacho; Siavash K Kurdistani; Ascia Eskin; Stanley F Nelson; William H Yong; Webster K Cavenee; Timothy F Cloughesy; Heather R Christofk; Douglas L Black; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 6.  MYC-induced cancer cell energy metabolism and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Chi V Dang; Anne Le; Ping Gao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Glioblastoma: from molecular pathology to targeted treatment.

Authors:  Timothy F Cloughesy; Webster K Cavenee; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 23.472

8.  mTOR complex 2 controls glycolytic metabolism in glioblastoma through FoxO acetylation and upregulation of c-Myc.

Authors:  Kenta Masui; Kazuhiro Tanaka; David Akhavan; Ivan Babic; Beatrice Gini; Tomoo Matsutani; Akio Iwanami; Feng Liu; Genaro R Villa; Yuchao Gu; Carl Campos; Shaojun Zhu; Huijun Yang; William H Yong; Timothy F Cloughesy; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Webster K Cavenee; Reuben J Shaw; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 27.287

  8 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Emerging roles of aerobic glycolysis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Z Wu; J Wu; Q Zhao; S Fu; J Jin
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Superhero Rictor promotes cellular differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Youming Zhu; Peng Wang; Li Zhang; Guo Bai; Chi Yang; Yuanying Wang; Jiacai He; Zhiyuan Zhang; Guoping Zhu; Duohong Zou
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Metabolic Reprogramming Mediated by the mTORC2-IRF4 Signaling Axis Is Essential for Macrophage Alternative Activation.

Authors:  Stanley Ching-Cheng Huang; Amber M Smith; Bart Everts; Marco Colonna; Erika L Pearce; Joel D Schilling; Edward J Pearce
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Mechanism of Cone Degeneration in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  De-Juan Song; Xiao-Li Bao; Bin Fan; Guang-Yu Li
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.046

5.  Critical role of SIK3 in mediating high salt and IL-17 synergy leading to breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Suneetha Amara; Ciera Majors; Bipradas Roy; Salisha Hill; Kristie L Rose; Elbert L Myles; Venkataswarup Tiriveedhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rewiring of cisplatin-resistant bladder cancer cells through epigenetic regulation of genes involved in amino acid metabolism.

Authors:  Austin Yeon; Sungyong You; Minhyung Kim; Amit Gupta; Myung Hee Park; Daniel J Weisenberger; Gangning Liang; Jayoung Kim
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 11.600

Review 7.  Autophagy-mediated tumor cell survival and progression of breast cancer metastasis to the brain.

Authors:  Aparna Maiti; Nitai C Hait
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  mTOR Complexes as a Nutrient Sensor for Driving Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Mio Harachi; Kenta Masui; Yukinori Okamura; Ryota Tsukui; Paul S Mischel; Noriyuki Shibata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  S-Palmitoylation as a Functional Regulator of Proteins Associated with Cisplatin Resistance in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Minhyung Kim; Peng Jin; Bo Zhou; Yang Wang; Wei Yang; Sungyong You; Jayoung Kim
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 10.  Exercise May Affect Metabolism in Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Jayoung Kim
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-09-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.