Literature DB >> 24583346

Quantitation OF ARGS aggrecan fragments in synovial fluid, serum and urine from osteoarthritis patients.

F M Germaschewski1, C J Matheny2, J Larkin2, F Liu2, L R Thomas3, J S Saunders2, K Sully3, C Whittall4, Y Boyle5, G Peters5, N M Graham4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterise ARGS neoepitope concentrations in various matrices from patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and assess performance of an immunoassay to facilitate clinical development of therapeutics affecting the A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS-5) pathway.
DESIGN: Matched sera, urine, and synovial fluid (SF) (surgical subjects only) were collected from healthy subjects, subjects with knee OA (non-surgical OA), and OA subjects undergoing total knee replacement (OA-TKR; n = 20 per group). Diurnal and inter-day variation was evaluated in the non-surgical OA group over 3 separate visits. Serum and urine samples were collected on two visits for the OA-TKR group with SF taken only at the time of surgery. ARGS neoepitope was quantitated using an optimized immunoassay.
RESULTS: Serum ARGS neoepitope concentrations were elevated in OA-TKR subjects compared to non-surgical OA subjects (P = 0.005) and healthy subjects (P = 0.0002). Creatinine corrected urinary ARGS neoepitope concentrations were more variable, but were also elevated in the OA-TKR subjects compared to healthy subjects (P = 0.008). No significant diurnal effect or inter-day variance was observed in serum or urine. Serum ARGS neoepitope concentrations correlated with age (P = 0.0252) but not with total number of joints with OA involvement. SF ARGS neoepitope concentrations correlated with Western Ontario and MacMaster OA Index (WOMAC) stiffness score (P = 0.04) whereas a weaker, non-significant trend towards positive correlation with combined WOMAC score and the number of concurrent joints was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study utilized a sensitive and robust assay to evaluate ARGS neoepitope concentrations in various matrices in OA patients and healthy volunteers. ARGS neoepitope appears promising as a prognostic/stratification marker to facilitate patient selection and as an early pharmacodynamic marker for OA therapeutic trials.
Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARGS; Aggrecan; Biomarker; Immunoassay; Neoepitope; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583346     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.02.930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  16 in total

1.  Intraarticular Matrix Metalloproteinases and Aggrecan Degradation Are Elevated After Articular Fracture.

Authors:  Justin M Haller; Craig A Swearingen; Deveree Partridge; Molly McFadden; Kannan Thirunavukkarasu; Thomas F Higgins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Translational development of an ADAMTS-5 antibody for osteoarthritis disease modification.

Authors:  J Larkin; T A Lohr; L Elefante; J Shearin; R Matico; J-L Su; Y Xue; F Liu; C Genell; R E Miller; P B Tran; A-M Malfait; C C Maier; C J Matheny
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the ADAMTS-5 Inhibitor GLPG1972/S201086 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip.

Authors:  Ellen van der Aar; Henri Deckx; Sonia Dupont; Ann Fieuw; Stephane Delage; Staffan Larsson; André Struglics; L Stefan Lohmander; Agnes Lalande; Emilie Leroux; David Amantini; Paul Passier
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  ADAMTS-4 activity in synovial fluid as a biomarker of inflammation and effusion.

Authors:  S Roberts; H Evans; K Wright; L van Niekerk; B Caterson; J B Richardson; K H S Kumar; J H Kuiper
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  The role of aggrecan in normal and osteoarthritic cartilage.

Authors:  Peter J Roughley; John S Mort
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16

Review 6.  Review of Prospects of Biological Fluid Biomarkers in Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Lich Thi Nguyen; Ashish Ranjan Sharma; Chiranjib Chakraborty; Balaji Saibaba; Moo-Eob Ahn; Sang-Soo Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A Novel High Sensitivity Type II Collagen Blood-Based Biomarker, PRO-C2, for Assessment of Cartilage Formation.

Authors:  Yunyun Luo; Yi He; Ditte Reker; Natasja Stæhr Gudmann; Kim Henriksen; Ole Simonsen; Christoph Ladel; Martin Michaelis; Ali Mobasheri; Morten Karsdal; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Bone Marrow Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Autologous Therapy for Osteonecrosis: Effects of Age and Underlying Causes.

Authors:  Jehan J El-Jawhari; Payal Ganguly; Elena Jones; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Synovial Fluid Biomarkers in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Evaluation Using BIPEDs Criteria.

Authors:  Angelo Boffa; Giulia Merli; Luca Andriolo; Christian Lattermann; Gian M Salzmann; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Chopping off the chondrocyte proteome.

Authors:  Mona Dvir-Ginzberg; Eli Reich
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.