Literature DB >> 24583024

Prognostic importance of self-reported traits/problems/strengths and environmental barriers/facilitators for predicting participation outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Mark Sherer1, Lynne C Davis2, Angelle M Sander2, Jerome S Caroselli2, Allison N Clark2, Nicholas J Pastorek3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the prognostic value of self-reported traits/problems/strengths and environmental barriers/facilitators for participation outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DATA SOURCES: Articles published through August 15, 2013, obtained by conducting electronic searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases and a review of reference lists of reviewed articles. STUDY SELECTION: Reviewed articles were written in English and presented findings on adult humans with TBI, participation outcomes, and ≥ 1 self-reported trait/problem/strength (eg, depression, pain, coping style) and/or ≥ 1 environment barrier/facilitator (eg, social support, family functioning, access to services). DATA EXTRACTION: Each of the 996 abstracts was examined by 2 reviewers, and those failing to meet all inclusion criteria were excluded. Data were extracted from the 63 retained articles by 2 independent reviewers, who met to resolve any differences in study quality rating or evidence recorded. Study quality was determined using American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Conclusions regarding prognostic importance of self-report and environmental barrier/facilitator variables were made using AAN criteria. Conclusions regarding barrier/facilitator variables indicated that access to transportation, access to services, and participation in social interaction were possibly predictive of employment outcome, whereas living arrangements and social support were possibly not predictive of employment outcome. Conclusions regarding self-report variables indicated that the number of postconcussive symptoms, fatigue, and physical competence were probably predictive of employment and need for supervision, whereas self-efficacy was probably not predictive of employment. Subjective well-being, pain, and social interaction were possibly predictive of employment, whereas coping style was possibly not predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: Although additional investigation is needed, self-report variables are likely to make important contributions to predicting participation outcomes. Future research should be guided by coherent conceptual models and use a consistent set of assessment instruments to facilitate comparisons between studies.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injuries; Community integration; Rehabilitation; Review [publication type]; Self report

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583024     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

1.  Subacute Pain after Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Lower Insular N-Acetylaspartate Concentrations.

Authors:  Eva Widerström-Noga; Varan Govind; James P Adcock; Bonnie E Levin; Andrew A Maudsley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  [Outcome in traumatic brain injury : Considered from a neurological viewpoint].

Authors:  B Beck
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Exploring the relationship between boredom proneness and self-control in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Authors:  Julia Isacescu; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rehabilitation needs and participation restriction in patients with cognitive disorder in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hironobu Sashika; Kaoruko Takada; Naohisa Kikuchi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Perceptions of recovery and rehabilitation in people with brain injury in Spain. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 6.  Updates and Current Perspectives of Psychiatric Assessments after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Zaninotto; Jessica Elias Vicentini; Felipe Fregni; Priscila Aparecida Rodrigues; Cibele Botelho; Mara Cristina Souza de Lucia; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Environmental Factors that Impact the Workplace Participation of Transition-Aged Young Adults with Brain-Based Disabilities: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Saeideh Shahin; Meaghan Reitzel; Briano Di Rezze; Sara Ahmed; Dana Anaby
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.