Literature DB >> 24582652

Diagnostic accuracy of intra-articular C-reactive protein assay in periprosthetic knee joint infection--a preliminary study.

C Ronde-Oustau1, Y Diesinger2, J-Y Jenny3, M Antoni2, J Gaudias2, C Boeri2, J Sibilia1, J-M Lessinger4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection often raises diagnostic challenges, as the published criteria are heterogeneous. New markers for predicting periprosthetic infection have been evaluated. Here, we assessed one of these markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), in joint fluid. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that intra-articular CRP levels would perform better than serum CRP concentrations in diagnosing knee prosthesis infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 30 patients including 10 with native-knee effusions, 11 with prosthetic-knee aseptic effusions, and 11 with prosthetic-knee infection defined using 2011 Musculoskeletal Society criteria. Serum CRP was assayed using turbidimetry or nephelometry and intra-articular CRP using nephelometry. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to compare the three groups; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Serum and intra-articular CRP levels were 5- to 16-fold higher in the group with periprosthetic infection than in the other two groups. Although the areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different, the likelihood ratios associated with the selected cut-offs suggested superiority of intra-articular CRP: a value > 2.78 mg/L suggested possible infection (100% sensitivity and 82% specificity) and a value > 5.37 mg/L probable infection (90% sensitivity and 91% specificity). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a possible role for intra-articular CRP assay in diagnosing knee prosthesis infection and perhaps periprosthetic infection at any site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study, development of a diagnostic criterion in consecutive patients comparatively to a reference standard.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intra-articular CRP; Periprosthetic infection; Surgical site infection; Total joint infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582652     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  5 in total

1.  Improved diagnosis of chronic hip and knee prosthetic joint infection using combined serum and synovial IL-6 tests.

Authors:  Leilei Qin; Xinyu Li; Jiawei Wang; Xuan Gong; Ning Hu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Synovial Cytokines and the MSIS Criteria Are Not Useful for Determining Infection Resolution After Periprosthetic Joint Infection Explantation.

Authors:  Salvatore J Frangiamore; Marcelo B P Siqueira; Anas Saleh; Thomas Daly; Carlos A Higuera; Wael K Barsoum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of synovial biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection: Synovasure™ is less effective than the ELISA-based alpha-defensin test.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; Ahmed Shaker; Atesch Ateschrang; Marius J B Keel; Christoph E Albers; Lukas Buetikofer; Sithombo Maqungo; Ulrich Stöckle; Sandro Kohl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Serum IL-6 in combination with synovial IL-6/CRP shows excellent diagnostic power to detect hip and knee prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Michal Svoboda; Jana Zapletalova; Jitka Proskova; Jarmila Juranova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development a stacking pad design for enhancing the sensitivity of lateral flow immunoassay.

Authors:  Tsung-Ting Tsai; Tse-Hao Huang; Chung-An Chen; Natalie Yi-Ju Ho; Yi-Ju Chou; Chien-Fu Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.