Literature DB >> 24582440

Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.

S G Larmer1, M Sargolzaei2, F S Schenkel3.   

Abstract

Genomic selection requires a large reference population to accurately estimate single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects. In some Canadian dairy breeds, the available reference populations are not large enough for accurate estimation of SNP effects for traits of interest. If marker phase is highly consistent across multiple breeds, it is theoretically possible to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for one or all breeds by pooling several breeds into a common reference population. This study investigated the extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in 5 major dairy breeds using a 50,000 (50K) SNP panel and 3 of the same breeds using the 777,000 (777K) SNP panel. Correlation of pair-wise SNP phase was also investigated on both panels. The level of LD was measured using the squared correlation of alleles at 2 loci (r(2)), and the consistency of SNP gametic phases was correlated using the signed square root of these values. Because of the high cost of the 777K panel, the accuracy of imputation from lower density marker panels [6,000 (6K) or 50K] was examined both within breed and using a multi-breed reference population in Holstein, Ayrshire, and Guernsey. Imputation was carried out using FImpute V2.2 and Beagle 3.3.2 software. Imputation accuracies were then calculated as both the proportion of correct SNP filled in (concordance rate) and allelic R(2). Computation time was also explored to determine the efficiency of the different algorithms for imputation. Analysis showed that LD values >0.2 were found in all breeds at distances at or shorter than the average adjacent pair-wise distance between SNP on the 50K panel. Correlations of r-values, however, did not reach high levels (<0.9) at these distances. High correlation values of SNP phase between breeds were observed (>0.94) when the average pair-wise distances using the 777K SNP panel were examined. High concordance rate (0.968-0.995) and allelic R(2) (0.946-0.991) were found for all breeds when imputation was carried out with FImpute from 50K to 777K. Imputation accuracy for Guernsey and Ayrshire was slightly lower when using the imputation method in Beagle. Computing time was significantly greater when using Beagle software, with all comparable procedures being 9 to 13 times less efficient, in terms of time, compared with FImpute. These findings suggest that use of a multi-breed reference population might increase prediction accuracy using the 777K SNP panel and that 777K genotypes can be efficiently and effectively imputed using the lower density 50K SNP panel.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  dairy; imputation; linkage disequilibrium

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582440     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  18 in total

1.  Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.

Authors:  Mario Pl Calus; Heyun Huang; Addie Vereijken; Jeroen Visscher; Jan Ten Napel; Jack J Windig
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Genotype imputation in the domestic dog.

Authors:  S G Friedenberg; K M Meurs
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Nasir Moghaddar; Klint P Gore; Hans D Daetwyler; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Linkage disequilibrium patterns and persistence of phase in purebred and crossbred pig (Sus scrofa) populations.

Authors:  Renata Veroneze; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Simone E F Guimarães; Fabyano F Silva; Barbara Harlizius; Marcos S Lopes; Paulo S Lopes
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Consequences of splitting whole-genome sequencing effort over multiple breeds on imputation accuracy.

Authors:  Aniek C Bouwman; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.

Authors:  Mario L Piccoli; José Braccini; Fernando F Cardoso; Medhi Sargolzaei; Steven G Larmer; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Characterization of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase and admixture in Australian and Canadian goats.

Authors:  Luiz F Brito; Mohsen Jafarikia; Daniela A Grossi; James W Kijas; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Ricardo V Ventura; Mehdi Salgorzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.

Authors:  Tatiane C S Chud; Ricardo V Ventura; Flavio S Schenkel; Roberto Carvalheiro; Marcos E Buzanskas; Jaqueline O Rosa; Maurício de Alvarenga Mudadu; Marcos Vinicius G B da Silva; Fabiana B Mokry; Cintia R Marcondes; Luciana C A Regitano; Danísio P Munari
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Imputation Accuracy from Low to Moderate Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chips in a Thai Multibreed Dairy Cattle Population.

Authors:  Danai Jattawa; Mauricio A Elzo; Skorn Koonawootrittriron; Thanathip Suwanasopee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.

Authors:  Ricardo V Ventura; Stephen P Miller; Ken G Dodds; Benoit Auvray; Michael Lee; Matthew Bixley; Shannon M Clarke; John C McEwan
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.