Literature DB >> 24582408

Effects of garments on photoanthropometry of body parts: application to stature estimation.

Tony Scoleri1, Teghan Lucas2, Maciej Henneberg3.   

Abstract

Person identification from images is an important task in many security applications and forensic investigations. The essence of the problem comes down to measuring key observable anatomical features which can help describing similarities or differences between two or more individuals. In this paper, we examine how different types of garments affect the placement of body markers that enable precise anatomical human description. We focus in particular on landmark positioning errors on the upper limb. Closed-form formulae are provided to compute the maximum likelihood estimate of upper limb length from an image. Subject stature is then predicted from the limb length through a regression model and used as identification criterion. Following initial laboratory experiments, the technique is demonstrated to be invariant to posture and applicable to uninformed subjects in unconstrained environments. Seven technical errors of measurement and statistical tests are quantified empirically from statures obtained by three assessors. Results show that thicker garments produce higher inaccuracies in landmark localisation but errors decrease as placement is repeated, as expected. Overall, comparison to truth reveals that on average statures are predicted with accuracy in excess of 96% for the worst assessor. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCTV; Clothing effects; Human characterisation; Human height estimation; Image measurement; Person identification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582408     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  2 in total

1.  Comparing the face to the body, which is better for identification?

Authors:  Teghan Lucas; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Interpol review of imaging and video 2016-2019.

Authors:  Zeno Geradts; Nienke Filius; Arnout Ruifrok
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.395

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.