Literature DB >> 24582297

Physical models of tissue in shear fields.

Edwin L Carstensen1, Kevin J Parker2.   

Abstract

This review considers three general classes of physical as opposed to phenomenological models of the shear elasticity of tissues. The first is simple viscoelasticity. This model has a special role in elastography because it is the language in which experimental and clinical data are communicated. The second class of models involves acoustic relaxation, in which the medium contains inner time-dependent systems that are driven through the external bulk medium. Hysteresis, the phenomenon characterizing the third class of models, involves losses that are related to strain rather than time rate of change of strain. In contrast to the vast efforts given to tissue characterization through their bulk moduli over the last half-century, similar research using low-frequency shear data is in its infancy. Rather than a neat summary of existing facts, this essay is a framework for hypothesis generation-guessing what physical mechanisms give tissues their shear properties.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Hysteresis; Shear elasticity; Shear models; Shear relaxation; Shear waves; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582297     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biological Effects of Low-Frequency Shear Strain: Physical Descriptors.

Authors:  Edwin L Carstensen; Kevin J Parker; Diane Dalecki; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  A simulation technique for 3D MR-guided acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Josh de Bever; Alexis Farrer; Brittany Coats; Dennis L Parker; Douglas A Christensen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media: validation of an approximate forward model.

Authors:  Fernando Zvietcovich; Natalie Baddour; Jannick P Rolland; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues.

Authors:  K J Parker; T Szabo; S Holm
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.

Authors:  Fernando Zvietcovich; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 6.  Power laws prevail in medical ultrasound.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Fat and fibrosis as confounding cofactors in viscoelastic measurements of the liver.

Authors:  S S Poul; K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Mitchell A Kirby; Ivan Pelivanov; Shaozhen Song; Łukasz Ambrozinski; Soon Joon Yoon; Liang Gao; David Li; Tueng T Shen; Ruikang K Wang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 9.  A review of physical and engineering factors potentially affecting shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Naotaka Nitta; Makoto Yamakawa; Hiroyuki Hachiya; Tsuyoshi Shiina
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 1.314

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.