Literature DB >> 24581635

Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals.

Miriam Byrne1, Jeffrey C Y Chan1, Eoin O'Broin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore how improvement in facial appearance is related to patients' perception and satisfaction following cleft rhinoplasty.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: 35 cleft rhinoplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2010. 45 observers comprised of healthcare professionals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of patient satisfaction including Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, Preoperative and Postoperative Semi-quantitative Ordinal Scale Rating (PPSOSR) and a specifically designed semi-structured questionnaire. Evaluation by panel of observers using Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) Rating and PPSOSR.
RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was high, based on the ROE questionnaire (score 76.1). 91% of patients rated their appearance as improved, 3% remained 'uncertain' and 6% felt 'different but not improved.' Teenage females (score 94.1) showed statistically higher satisfaction, when compared to older females (score 75.5), or their male counterparts (score 69.8). The preoperative appearance ratings were not statistically different between patients and panel members but postoperatively, patients' rating of their appearance was statistically higher. All components of the AMAI were scored between 'good' to 'fair' (score 9.3). Seventy percent of the panel rated the postoperative appearance as improved. Interestingly, 10% rated the postoperative appearance as 'unchanged', while 3% reported a 'worsened' appearance. There was no correlation between panel assessment of aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Cleft rhinoplasty contributes to subjective patient satisfaction as a result of their perceived improvement in appearance and function, even though this was not correlated to objective aesthetic rating by panel members.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic; Cleft-lip nasal deformity; Perception; Rhinoplasty; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24581635     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Carolin Unger; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Keskanya Subbalekha
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22

2.  Use of Routine Prospective Functional and Aesthetic Patient Satisfaction Measurements in Secondary Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Floris V W J van Zijl; Sarah Versnel; Egge F van der Poel; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Frank R Datema
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale.

Authors:  Matthew K Lee; Sam P Most
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-02-04

4.  Assessment of Aesthetic Results of 100 Patients Who Underwent Rhinoplasty-Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kotzampasakis; Panagiotis Mantalos; Stylianos Kotzampasakis; Nikolaos Danias; Thomas Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-15

5.  Aesthetics Assessment and Patient Reported Outcome of Nasolabial Aesthetics in 18-Year-Old Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip.

Authors:  Frans J Mulder; David G M Mosmuller; Riekie H C W de Vet; J P W Don Griot
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.